Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Burlington High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Burlington High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Burlington (00480000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Burlington High (00480505)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
51% - Partially meeting targets60

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement44-44-
Achievement total81247.551267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total0810.02410.0
Weighted total6.710.7-4.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 63%-39%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total51247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total71220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total4.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 58

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 98.8 -0.5 100.0 2394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.7 97.1 -1.6 100.0 601No Change
High needs 96.6 95.7 -0.9 98.6 461No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.3 98.1 -0.2 100.0 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 374Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 99.3 0.0 100.0 1674Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.7 92.8 -2.9 97.4 2390Declined
Lowest Performing 84.9 73.8 -11.1 87.7 600Declined
High needs 83.7 79.3 -4.4 85.8 460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.7 88.5 -1.2 92.8 261No Change
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 99.2 97.3 -1.9 100.0 373Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.6 93.4 -2.2 97.2 1671No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.7 94.3 3.6 92.4 2274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 70.1 82.9 12.8 74.4 604Exceeded Target
High needs 72.9 84.1 11.2 75.7 414Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 80.4 89.8 9.4 83.3 224Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 95.8 98.6 2.8 97.9 364Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.4 94.7 4.3 92.2 1614Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.6 50.0 2272Below Target
Lowest Performing 35.3 50.0 571Below Target
High needs 42.3 50.0 422Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.5 50.0 232Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 50.7 50.0 363Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.1 50.0 1612Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.8 50.0 2252Below Target
Lowest Performing 35.8 50.0 561Below Target
High needs 48.7 50.0 422Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.9 50.0 233Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 50.1 50.0 363Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.0 50.0 1592Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.2 97.3 0.1 99.5 2573Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.1 93.2 -0.9 98.2 590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.5 90.7 -1.8 97.6 430Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 93.3 100.0 6.7 97.4 374Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.9 96.8 -1.1 100.0 1903Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 98.8 1.1 99.4 2483Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.7 98.5 6.8 95.7 684Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.2 97.5 8.3 93.5 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 99.0 1.6 99.2 1933Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.2 0.2 1.0 9774Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.6 -0.6 1.0 1613Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 774Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1444Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 42--
Hispanic/Latino---- 54--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.0 7044Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.6 9.2 -1.6 6.5 9800Declined
Lowest Performing 12.1 10.0 2.1 5.5 602Improved Below Target
High needs 16.5 21.4 -4.9 14.1 1820Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.0 24.8 0.2 20.4 1012Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 45--
Students w/ disabilities---- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian 6.1 5.1 1.0 3.3 1374Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 48--
Hispanic/Latino---- 57--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 7.5 8.7 -1.2 6.3 7013Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.4 61.7 -15.7 83.1 4810Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 29.3 25.0 -4.3 37.8 840Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.8 32.1 -4.7 47.2 560Declined
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian 92.0 84.5 -7.5 100.0 713Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 22--
Hispanic/Latino---- 28--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 76.9 59.9 -17.0 82.2 3420Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 247 246100Yes 1 247 246100Yes 1 247 247100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 50 4998Yes 1 50 4998Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 28 2796Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 9----
Students w/ disabilities 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Asian 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 13----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 16----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 171 171100Yes 1 171 171100Yes 1 171 171100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles