Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pine Glen Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Pine Glen Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Burlington (00480000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Pine Glen Elementary (00480020)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total71267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.03410.0
Weighted total5.810.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 56%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage75%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 55

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.8 503.1 5.3 499.3 1384Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 483.0 493.0 10.0 488.5 254Exceeded Target
High needs 489.8 493.0 3.2 491.6 384Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.0 503.5 6.5 498.7 1094Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 501.2 -1.7 504.4 1370Declined
Lowest Performing 481.5 488.0 6.5 484.5 254Exceeded Target
High needs 492.1 490.1 -2.0 493.7 390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.1 500.8 -1.3 503.8 1080Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.3 86.7 0.4 89.0 603Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.0 86.7 -0.3 89.8 453Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.3 50.0 972Below Target
Lowest Performing 51.8 50.0 253Met Target
High needs 50.9 50.0 233Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.5 50.0 782Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.9 50.0 962Below Target
Lowest Performing 55.6 50.0 253Met Target
High needs 47.7 50.0 232Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 43.9 50.0 772Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.6 5.4 0.2 4.3 2592Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 4.0 -4.0 0.0 253Met Target
High needs 5.8 8.1 -2.3 3.5 860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 41--
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 38--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.0 3.2 1.8 3.3 1883Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 141 13999Yes 1 142 14099Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 40 3895Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 17----
Econ. Disadvantaged 18---- 18---- 9----
EL and Former EL 15---- 15---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 18---- 18---- 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 15---- 16---- 8----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6---- 6---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 111 11099Yes 1 111 10998Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles