Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Conley Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - George H Conley

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
George H Conley (00350122)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low participation rate: EL and former EL
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
70% - Partially meeting targets31

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total41260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total7820.08822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.04410.0
Weighted total3.89.6-7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 40%-100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 43

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.7 499.6 2.9 498.2 934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 475.2 492.2 17.0 480.7 204Exceeded Target
High needs 491.7 494.6 2.9 493.5 634Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.8 494.4 3.6 492.1 474Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 494.9 492.1 -2.8 496.2 280Declined
Students w/ disabilities 487.0 491.8 4.8 488.8 304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 488.1 495.8 7.7 489.7 454Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 500.8 497.3 -3.5 502.3 310Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.6 491.2 -3.4 496.1 950Declined
Lowest Performing 475.4 484.7 9.3 478.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 490.7 485.5 -5.2 492.3 650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.2 485.9 -4.3 491.2 490Declined
EL and Former EL 497.7 480.9 -16.8 499.2 280Declined
Students w/ disabilities 489.4 481.4 -8.0 491.2 310Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 486.8 488.4 1.6 489.1 462Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 497.0 485.9 -11.1 498.6 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.8 61.4 -9.4 73.5 220Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.2 50.0 594Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 66.0 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 62.0 50.0 374Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 63.0 50.0 294Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 58.7 50.0 313Met Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 7--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.1 50.0 603Met Target
Lowest Performing 62.0 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 55.7 50.0 383Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.9 50.0 303Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 59.2 50.0 323Met Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 7--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.3 43.8 -35.5 70.2 480Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 79.3 43.8 -35.5 70.2 480Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 17.1 18.6 -1.5 15.8 1830Declined
Lowest Performing 10.0 0.0 10.0 6.1 204Exceeded Target
High needs 21.9 22.7 -0.8 19.6 1320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.3 24.7 -3.4 18.2 890Declined
EL and Former EL 21.6 22.0 -0.4 18.9 591No Change
Students w/ disabilities 29.8 31.8 -2.0 26.0 660Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black 9.0 12.0 -3.0 5.3 750Declined
Hispanic/Latino 29.9 30.3 -0.4 26.2 661No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 29--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 105 10196Yes 1 104 10399Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 70 6697Yes 2 70 6999Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 54 5197Yes 2 54 5398Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 30 2894No 2 30 2997Yes 1 9----
Students w/ disabilities 33 3195Yes 2 32 3197Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 50 4998Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 16----
Hispanic/Latino 34 3196Yes 2 34 3397Yes 1 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 11---- 11---- 1----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles