Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Beverly Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - North Beverly Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Beverly (00300000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
North Beverly Elementary (00300040)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
94% - Meeting targets79

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.04410.0
Weighted total9.410.3-7.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 91%-97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage94%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 63

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 510.1 7.2 504.4 2124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.4 488.4 8.0 485.1 344Exceeded Target
High needs 493.3 497.9 4.6 494.9 844Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.8 500.4 5.6 496.2 514Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 487.9 487.9 0.0 489.6 511No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.9 511.8 7.9 505.5 1754Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.9 502.9 2.0 502.3 2124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 475.1 482.2 7.1 478.7 344Exceeded Target
High needs 490.0 490.8 0.8 491.7 842Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.7 490.1 -2.6 493.8 510Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 482.6 482.7 0.1 484.7 512Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.5 504.9 3.4 503.0 1754Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.4 78.9 1.5 79.8 643Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.6 59.1 -6.5 68.4 220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.2 81.7 1.5 82.6 563Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.9 50.0 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 57.2 50.0 343Met Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 543Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.8 50.0 313Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 46.5 50.0 292Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.6 50.0 1264Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.8 50.0 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 60.8 50.0 344Exceeded Target
High needs 57.0 50.0 543Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.3 50.0 313Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 54.9 50.0 293Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 63.3 50.0 1264Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.7 5.5 0.2 4.6 3432Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 8.3 2.9 5.4 4.7 344Exceeded Target
High needs 12.0 10.9 1.1 9.6 1472Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.3 17.3 0.0 13.8 811No Change
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 8.8 -2.7 2.8 800Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 54--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 4.9 0.3 3.9 2652Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 220 219100Yes 1 220 219100Yes 1 67 6699Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 91 9099Yes 1 91 9099Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 57 57100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1 15----
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 5----
Students w/ disabilities 53 5298Yes 1 53 5298Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 4---- 4---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 179 17899Yes 1 179 17899Yes 1 58 5798Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles