Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Centerville Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Centerville Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Beverly (00300000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Centerville Elementary (00300010)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
90% - Meeting targets60

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total7822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total9.410.3-6.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 91%-88%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 40

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.0 504.5 4.5 501.5 1884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 476.1 483.0 6.9 480.8 294Exceeded Target
High needs 490.1 490.8 0.7 491.7 792Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.3 492.9 1.6 492.7 573Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 478.5 479.4 0.9 480.2 462Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 491.4 490.3 -1.1 492.5 330Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.8 507.5 4.7 504.4 1424Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.4 499.6 3.2 497.8 1884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 469.4 476.2 6.8 473.0 294Exceeded Target
High needs 487.0 486.9 -0.1 488.7 791No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.1 490.4 2.3 489.2 574Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 475.6 474.7 -0.9 477.7 460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 489.2 491.0 1.8 490.8 333Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.0 502.7 3.7 500.5 1424Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.1 74.6 3.5 73.5 583Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.0 63.0 3.0 62.8 273Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.7 78.9 -0.8 82.1 451No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.1 50.0 1263Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.0 50.0 292Below Target
High needs 49.6 50.0 492Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.4 50.0 373Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 41.3 50.0 242Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 45.5 50.0 202Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.0 50.0 983Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.7 50.0 1254Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 49.6 50.0 292Below Target
High needs 58.7 50.0 483Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 61.1 50.0 364Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 49.4 50.0 232Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 67.7 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.6 50.0 974Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.0 9.0 2.0 9.9 3234Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 22.6 10.3 12.3 19.0 294Exceeded Target
High needs 21.4 17.6 3.8 19.0 1424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.4 20.8 1.6 18.9 1062Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 25.4 22.1 3.3 22.1 683Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 26.5 18.2 8.3 22.9 554Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.2 6.7 -0.5 4.9 2401No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 198 19799Yes 1 199 19899Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 87 87100Yes 1 88 88100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 64 64100Yes 1 65 65100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 8---- 9---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 49 49100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 35 35100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 147 14699Yes 1 147 14699Yes 1 46 4598Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles