Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bedford High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Bedford High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Bedford (00230000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Bedford High (00230505)
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
56% - Partially meeting targets75

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement44-44-
Achievement total91247.551267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total1810.00410.0
Weighted total7.510.7-4.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 70%-42%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage56%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total51247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate14-
High school completion total51220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion14-
Additional indicators total5810.0
Weighted total4.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 45%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 62

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 98.9 -0.5 100.0 2014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.0 96.7 -1.3 99.4 461No Change
High needs 97.8 95.7 -2.1 99.4 521No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 97.8 93.9 -3.9 99.7 330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 26--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.3 99.3 0.0 100.0 1374Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.5 95.5 -1.0 98.0 1991No Change
Lowest Performing 88.8 83.3 -5.5 90.8 450Declined
High needs 88.9 84.5 -4.4 91.1 500Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 84.8 76.6 -8.2 87.8 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 26--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 96.4 96.0 -0.4 98.0 1361No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.5 96.8 4.3 93.9 1874Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 79.5 89.1 9.6 81.6 464Exceeded Target
High needs 83.5 89.1 5.6 85.8 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 80.9 83.6 2.7 83.2 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 92.8 96.3 3.5 94.2 1304Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 50.0 1753Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.8 50.0 432Below Target
High needs 45.1 50.0 432Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 41.7 50.0 292Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 12--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.7 50.0 1223Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.6 50.0 1742Below Target
Lowest Performing 42.2 50.0 422Below Target
High needs 43.1 50.0 422Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 44.5 50.0 282Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 12--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.6 50.0 1212Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 98.5 3.3 96.4 2064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.7 95.4 7.7 90.9 654Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 81.8 91.7 9.9 86.4 364Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 23--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 95.1 98.0 2.9 96.5 1514Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 97.6 -1.1 99.7 2093Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.7 93.0 -2.7 98.5 570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 92.5 90.9 -1.6 96.0 330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 97.5 -0.6 99.2 1633Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 8583Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.0 1861No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 64--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 1.6 0.0 1.4 1271No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 90--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 64--
Hispanic/Latino---- 57--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 45--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 5--
White 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.0 5974Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.7 10.8 -0.1 9.7 8331No Change
Lowest Performing 14.0 17.4 -3.4 8.7 460Declined
High needs 25.4 21.1 4.3 22.7 1994Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 72--
EL and Former EL---- 34--
Students w/ disabilities 26.2 25.8 0.4 22.3 1242Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 92--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 62--
Hispanic/Latino---- 71--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 46--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 9.6 10.4 -0.8 8.3 5600Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.6 48.8 -3.8 55.8 4260Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 13.3 12.4 -0.9 21.3 891No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 4.6 1.4 10.7 652Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 44--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 35--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 51.3 49.3 -2.0 54.3 2900Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 207 206100Yes 1 206 20499Yes 1 206 205100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 54 5398Yes 1 53 5196Yes 1 53 5298Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 5---- 5----
Students w/ disabilities 34 3397Yes 1 34 3296Yes 2 34 3397Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 13----
Hispanic/Latino 18---- 17---- 17----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 140 13999Yes 1 140 13899Yes 1 140 13999Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles