Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John Glenn Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - John Glenn Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Bedford (00230000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
John Glenn Middle (00230305)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
64% - Partially meeting targets71

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total91267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.01410.0
Weighted total7.510.3-4.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 73%-55%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 42

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.1 507.5 1.4 507.6 5763Met Target
Lowest Performing 483.8 486.3 2.5 488.5 942Improved Below Target
High needs 491.2 490.4 -0.8 492.8 1750Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.2 490.4 -4.8 496.6 480Declined
EL and Former EL 498.3 495.4 -2.9 500.3 600Declined
Students w/ disabilities 487.9 482.6 -5.3 489.6 1070Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 513.0 517.9 4.9 515.1 964Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 494.2 487.6 -6.6 495.8 330Declined
Hispanic/Latino 496.9 496.3 -0.6 498.0 310Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 509.1 504.3 -4.8 510.7 250Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.0 507.7 1.7 507.6 3913Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.5 509.5 1.0 509.9 5743Met Target
Lowest Performing 484.9 486.5 1.6 488.5 942Improved Below Target
High needs 491.7 493.5 1.8 493.4 1743Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.3 490.3 0.0 491.4 481No Change
EL and Former EL 504.7 501.8 -2.9 506.9 600Declined
Students w/ disabilities 486.6 485.2 -1.4 488.7 1060Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 525.2 524.7 -0.5 527.7 964Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 491.0 487.9 -3.1 492.5 320Declined
Hispanic/Latino 498.2 499.9 1.7 499.8 313Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 512.3 509.4 -2.9 513.8 253Met Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.6 508.3 1.7 508.1 3903Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 73.2 76.7 3.5 75.6 2103Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.0 61.2 11.2 52.8 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 44.4 59.3 14.9 47.5 354Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 39--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 73.6 76.9 3.3 76.0 1433Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.8 50.0 5592Below Target
Lowest Performing 52.8 50.0 933Met Target
High needs 43.2 50.0 1692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.3 50.0 472Below Target
EL and Former EL 47.4 50.0 582Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 37.7 50.0 1031Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 57.3 50.0 933Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black 39.6 50.0 301Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 48.4 50.0 312Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 35.1 50.0 251Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.4 50.0 3802Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.4 50.0 5593Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.8 50.0 943Met Target
High needs 49.1 50.0 1712Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.5 50.0 472Below Target
EL and Former EL 51.0 50.0 593Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 46.6 50.0 1042Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.4 50.0 933Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black 38.6 50.0 291Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 58.9 50.0 313Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 42.4 50.0 252Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.0 50.0 3813Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.7 3.9 -0.2 2.6 5883Met Target
Lowest Performing 7.2 7.4 -0.2 3.6 941No Change
High needs 8.0 9.1 -1.1 5.6 1640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 13.0 -1.9 7.6 460Declined
EL and Former EL 3.3 4.6 -1.3 0.0 650Declined
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 10.4 -3.3 3.8 1060Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 2.3 2.0 0.3 0.0 1004Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 16.1 8.6 7.5 12.3 354Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 6.1 -3.2 0.0 330Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 0.0 4.0 -4.0 0.0 253Met Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.3 3.8 -0.5 2.0 3953Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 585 584100Yes 1 585 58299Yes 1 213 21199Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 181 181100Yes 1 181 18099Yes 1 57 5698Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 50 50100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 64 64100Yes 1 64 64100Yes 1 13----
Students w/ disabilities 107 107100Yes 1 107 10699Yes 1 36 3597Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 100 100100Yes 1 100 100100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 34 3397Yes 1 34 3295Yes 2 14----
Hispanic/Latino 33 33100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 393 393100Yes 1 393 392100Yes 1 144 14399Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles