Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Davis Hill Elementary

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Davis Hill Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 95.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.6, Target = 95.9 75 or Higher All Students 92.9 90.1 90.6 0.5 95.9 96.5 7327050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.2, Target = 87.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 74.2, Target = 87.2 75 or Higher High needs 78.1 78.3 74.2 -4.1 87.2 89.1 41660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  87.5---- 93.8-28--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.9, Target = 82.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 65.9, Target = 82.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 70.2 69.7 65.9 -3.8 82.6 85.1 55410Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 95.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.8, Target = 95.9 75 or Higher White 93.0 90.0 90.8 0.8 95.9 96.5 6624750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 94.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.8, Target = 94.1 75 or Higher All Students 89.8 90.9 90.8 -0.1 94.1 94.9 7526925No Change
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 84.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.9, Target = 84.5 75 or Higher High needs 73.4 81.3 76.9 -4.4 84.5 86.7 55660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  81.3---- 90.7-28--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.3, Target = 78.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 71.3, Target = 78.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 63.7 80.3 71.3 -9.0 78.8 81.9 68410Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 94.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91, Target = 94.3 75 or Higher White 90.3 91.9 91.0 -0.9 94.3 95.2 6924625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 91.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.9, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher All Students 85.5 90.1 84.9 -5.2 91.5 92.8 64960Declined
High needs  76.0---- 88.0-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.9, Target = 90.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.9, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher White 84.0 91.3 84.9 -6.4 90.7 92.0 50880Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.8 19.32700 3.5 2.627025
High needs 6.7 3.0660 13.3 9.16625
Econ. Disadvantaged--28---28-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 3.0 2.4410 21.2 14.64125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 19.02470 3.4 2.424725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.4 42.026925 3.1 4.12690
High needs 21.7 18.2660 8.3 12.1660
Econ. Disadvantaged--28---28-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 18.2 17.1410 9.1 17.1410
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.9 41.924625 2.1 4.12460
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.3 30.29625 1.2 7.3960
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.4 31.88825 0.0 8.0880
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 61.0 56.0 -5.0 51.0No18275On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 53.0 43.0 -10.0 51.0No4650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.5 56.0 -5.5 51.0No16875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 51.0 48.0 -3.0 51.0No18050Below Target
High needsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 49.5 41.5 -8.0 51.0No4450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 52.0 47.5 -4.5 51.0No16650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010.00-
High needs- 60.010.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.010.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students277277100Yes276276100Yes9898100Yes
High needs7171100Yes7171100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3030100Yes3030100Yes12---
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities4545100Yes4545100Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White252252100Yes251251100Yes8989100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles