Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Major Edwards Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Major Edwards Elementary
Organization Information
District:West Boylston (03220000)School type:Elementary School
School:Major Edwards Elementary (03220005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8 87.6 87.5 84.7 -2.8 92.8 93.8 462090Declined
High needsCPI = 68.3, Target = 81.3CPI = 68.3, Target = 81.3CPI = 68.3, Target = 81.3 67.9 69.6 68.3 -1.3 81.3 84.0 195625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.3, Target = 75.3CPI = 69.3, Target = 75.3CPI = 69.3, Target = 75.3 73.0 73.0 69.3 -3.7 75.3 86.5 21350Declined
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.1, Target = 77.2CPI = 57.1, Target = 77.2CPI = 57.1, Target = 77.2 60.9 54.3 57.1 2.8 77.2 80.5 292850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7 87.5 88.4 86.4 -2.0 92.7 93.8 4018225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 90.7CPI = 86.7, Target = 90.7CPI = 86.7, Target = 90.7 84.0 86.6 86.7 0.1 90.7 92.0 5420650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.9, Target = 79.9CPI = 67.9, Target = 79.9CPI = 67.9, Target = 79.9 65.6 71.3 67.9 -3.4 79.9 82.8 20560Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.6, Target = 78.9CPI = 73.6, Target = 78.9CPI = 73.6, Target = 78.9 77.0 77.0 73.6 -3.4 78.9 88.5 39350Declined
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 56.3, Target = 78.3CPI = 56.3, Target = 78.3 62.8 56.9 56.3 -0.6 78.3 81.4 262825No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.4, Target = 90.7 84.0 87.9 87.4 -0.5 90.7 92.0 4618025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.9, Target = 90.9CPI = 89.9, Target = 90.9 84.4 90.6 89.9 -0.7 90.9 92.2 838275On Target
High needs  73.8---- 86.9-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.2, Target = 90.5CPI = 89.2, Target = 90.5CPI = 89.2, Target = 90.5 83.7 91.7 89.2 -2.5 90.5 91.9 717275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.8 16.32090 6.5 6.72090
High needs 8.3 7.1560 20.0 21.4560
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.2 8.6350 18.4 17.1350
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.62825 37.9 42.9280
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.7 18.11820 5.7 7.11820
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.8 30.62060 6.1 5.82060
High needs 15.0 7.1560 21.7 21.4560
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.4 5.7350 15.8 17.1350
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 7.12825 37.9 32.12825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.0 32.21800 4.6 5.01800
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.2 30.5820 0.0 4.9820
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.9 30.6720 0.0 5.6720
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 58.0 53.0 -5.0 51.0No14375On Target
High needsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 48.0 53.5 5.5 51.0No3675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 58.0 54.0 -4.0 51.0No12975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 54.0 51.5 -2.5 51.0No14075On Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 54.0 40.0 -14.0 51.0No3625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.0 54.0 0.0 51.0No12775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21221099Yes21220999Yes868498Yes
High needs585697Yes5858100Yes232296Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3737100Yes3737100Yes16---
EL and Former EL13---13---5---
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes2828100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18418399Yes18418299Yes747399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles