Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sutton Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Sutton Elementary

Organization Information
District:Sutton (02900000)School type:Elementary School
School:Sutton Elementary (02900005)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.2 86.6 87.7 86.4 -1.3 92.2 93.3 5334725No Change
High needsCPI = 70.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 70.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 70.4, Target = 83.3 71.4 71.8 70.4 -1.4 83.3 85.7 2610325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 85.4 84.1 84.1 80.5 -3.6 85.4 92.1 69320Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 65.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 65.6, Target = 80.6 66.8 66.1 65.6 -0.5 80.6 83.4 548025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 92.3CPI = 86.9, Target = 92.3CPI = 86.9, Target = 92.3 86.8 87.6 86.9 -0.7 92.3 93.4 4331425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 89.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 89.5CPI = 84.7, Target = 89.5 82.0 84.2 84.7 0.5 89.5 91.0 4734650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 70.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 70.1, Target = 79.9 65.6 71.4 70.1 -1.3 79.9 82.8 2610225No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.9, Target = 77.1CPI = 78.9, Target = 77.1CPI = 78.9, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 78.9 3.9 77.1 87.5 6232100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.6, Target = 78.1CPI = 64.6, Target = 78.1CPI = 64.6, Target = 78.1 62.5 69.0 64.6 -4.4 78.1 81.3 51790Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 89.3CPI = 85.5, Target = 89.3CPI = 85.5, Target = 89.3 81.7 84.3 85.5 1.2 89.3 90.9 3731350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 79.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 79.1, Target = 88.7 80.6 83.9 79.1 -4.8 88.7 90.3 441280Declined
High needsCPI = 64.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 64.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 64.1, Target = 80.6 66.7 72.0 64.1 -7.9 80.6 83.4 38390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60, Target = 80.4CPI = 60, Target = 80.4CPI = 60, Target = 80.4 66.4 69.0 60.0 -9.0 80.4 83.2 43300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.9, Target = 88.4CPI = 78.9, Target = 88.4CPI = 78.9, Target = 88.4 80.1 83.8 78.9 -4.9 88.4 90.1 261150Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 9.4 10.13470 4.7 6.13470
High needs 1.7 1.01030 14.4 16.51030
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.9 3.1320 4.9 6.3320
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0800 19.5 21.3800
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 8.7 10.531425 4.8 5.73140
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 18.6 26.334625 5.5 7.23460
High needs 5.1 4.91020 13.6 19.61020
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.9 9.43225 14.6 12.53225
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 4.6 2.5790 14.9 25.3790
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 18.4 27.231325 5.4 6.73130
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.6 8.61280 4.1 4.71280
High needs 2.4 0.0390 12.2 15.4390
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 0.0300 17.2 20.0300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.3 8.71150 4.3 5.21150
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 51.0 54.0 3.0 51.0No22975On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 49.0 53.0 4.0 51.0No5775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 47.0 53.0 6.0 51.0No4675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 50.0 54.0 4.0 51.0No20675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 45.0 47.0 2.0 51.0Yes22775On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 45.5 37.5 -8.0 51.0No5625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 49.0 43.0 -6.0 51.0No4550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 43.0 48.0 5.0 51.0Yes20475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students355354100Yes35535399Yes130130100Yes
High needs11010999Yes11010898Yes4141100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3737100Yes3737100Yes13---
EL and Former EL8---8---3---
Students w/ disabilities818099Yes817998Yes3030100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---4---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White322321100Yes32232099Yes117117100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles