Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Warner

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Warner

Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Warner (02810180)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 90.8 84.3 78.6 83.9 5.3 90.8 92.2 4212350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81, Target = 90.6CPI = 81, Target = 90.6CPI = 81, Target = 90.6 83.9 76.5 81.0 4.5 90.6 92.0 7410050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.1, Target = 80.1CPI = 81.1, Target = 80.1 78.3 78.3 81.1 2.8 80.1 89.2 719475On Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black  88.9---- 94.5-29--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6 82.1 74.7 79.5 4.8 89.6 91.1 787750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------15--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 91.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 91.8, Target = 89.4 81.8 87.5 91.8 4.3 89.4 90.9 79125100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 90.4, Target = 88.5CPI = 90.4, Target = 88.5 80.3 85.7 90.4 4.7 88.5 90.2 97102100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.1, Target = 88.3CPI = 90.1, Target = 88.3CPI = 90.1, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 90.1 2.9 88.3 93.6 9696100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black  79.8---- 89.9-29--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 91, Target = 88.6CPI = 91, Target = 88.6CPI = 91, Target = 88.6 80.4 84.7 91.0 6.3 88.6 90.2 9778100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------16--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 55.6, Target = 81.5CPI = 55.6, Target = 81.5CPI = 55.6, Target = 81.5 68.2 72.2 55.6 -16.6 81.5 84.1 9490Declined
High needsCPI = 50.6, Target = 77.8CPI = 50.6, Target = 77.8CPI = 50.6, Target = 77.8 62.0 67.9 50.6 -17.3 77.8 81.0 12390Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 51.4, Target = 72.7CPI = 51.4, Target = 72.7CPI = 51.4, Target = 72.7 70.2 70.2 51.4 -18.8 72.7 85.1 20370Declined
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino  67.0---- 83.5-31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.4 6.512325 8.5 7.312325
High needs 4.1 3.01000 8.2 9.01000
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.4 2.1940 6.7 8.5940
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--29---29-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.67725 10.0 10.4770
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--15---15-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.3 41.612525 3.4 4.01250
High needs 20.4 37.310225 4.1 4.91020
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.2 36.59625 3.3 5.2960
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--29---29-
Hispanic/Latino 21.3 37.27825 5.0 5.1780
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--16---16-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 2.04925 13.9 22.4490
High needs 0.0 0.0390 17.9 28.2390
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0370 15.4 27.0370
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--31---31-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 39.0 45.5 6.5 51.0Yes7875On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 39.0 45.5 6.5 51.0Yes6475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 40.0 44.0 4.0 51.0Yes6075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 44.0 38.0 -6.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-10--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 31.0 57.5 26.5 51.0Yes82100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 30.0 57.0 27.0 51.0Yes68100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 26.0 56.5 30.5 51.0Yes64100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 30.5 59.0 28.5 51.0Yes54100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 37.0 60.0240
High needs 37.0 60.0240
EL and Former EL- 60.024-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13613398Yes136136100Yes5353100Yes
High needs11210997Yes112112100Yes4242100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged10610397Yes106106100Yes4040100Yes
EL and Former EL23---23---8---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black313097Yes3131100Yes15---
Hispanic/Latino868599Yes8686100Yes3333100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17---17---5---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles