Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Alice B Beal Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Alice B Beal Elementary
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Alice B Beal Elementary (02810175)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2 79.8 82.5 90.5 8.0 88.2 89.9 73100100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 85.8 75.7 77.5 87.8 10.3 85.8 87.9 9572100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.8, Target = 80.7CPI = 88.8, Target = 80.7CPI = 88.8, Target = 80.7 78.9 78.9 88.8 9.9 80.7 89.5 9569100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 90.3, Target = 86.8CPI = 90.3, Target = 86.8CPI = 90.3, Target = 86.8 77.3 79.0 90.3 11.3 86.8 88.7 9849100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 94.6, Target = 92.2CPI = 94.6, Target = 92.2 86.7 85.5 94.6 9.1 92.2 93.4 8928100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 88.8, Target = 89.2 81.4 82.7 88.8 6.1 89.2 90.7 6510075On Target
High needsCPI = 84.7, Target = 88.3CPI = 84.7, Target = 88.3CPI = 84.7, Target = 88.3 79.9 78.7 84.7 6.0 88.3 90.0 857250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.1, Target = 81.3CPI = 85.1, Target = 81.3CPI = 85.1, Target = 81.3 79.6 79.6 85.1 5.5 81.3 89.8 8569100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 87.8, Target = 88.5CPI = 87.8, Target = 88.5 80.2 81.0 87.8 6.8 88.5 90.1 924975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 92.5CPI = 92, Target = 92.5 87.2 86.3 92.0 5.7 92.5 93.6 752875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 93.1CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.1CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.1 88.1 86.9 88.5 1.6 93.1 94.1 773950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 86, Target = 90.8CPI = 86, Target = 90.8CPI = 86, Target = 90.8 84.2 81.9 86.0 4.1 90.8 92.1 962575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------9--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.0 12.010025 8.8 3.010025
High needs 1.2 11.17225 12.3 4.27225
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.3 11.66925 10.5 2.96925
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino 3.2 6.14925 11.3 2.04925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.1 25.02825 6.5 0.02825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.1 33.010025 7.0 8.01000
High needs 16.0 33.37225 9.9 11.1720
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.8 34.86925 9.2 10.1690
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino 12.9 24.54925 8.1 6.14925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.3 42.92825 6.5 7.1280
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.0 25.63925 10.0 2.63925
High needs 20.7 16.0250 13.8 4.02525
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--9---9-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 47.0 60.0 13.0 51.0Yes62100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 46.0 60.0 14.0 51.0Yes42100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 43.5 58.0 14.5 51.0Yes41100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-11--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 54.0 54.0 0.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 55.5 53.0 -2.5 51.0Yes6175On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 51.0 53.0 2.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 51.5 53.5 2.0 51.0Yes4075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 55.0 49.0 -6.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 75.5 60.02025
High needs 75.5 60.02025
EL and Former EL- 60.020-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11711699Yes11711699Yes4343100Yes
High needs8787100Yes8787100Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged8484100Yes8484100Yes27---
EL and Former EL17---17---5---
Students w/ disabilities13---13---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---1---
Afr. Amer./Black18---18---9---
Hispanic/Latino5757100Yes5757100Yes22---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White313097Yes313097Yes10---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles