Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Glenwood
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Glenwood
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Glenwood (02810065)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 76.1, Target = 87.2CPI = 76.1, Target = 87.2 78.1 69.6 76.1 6.5 87.2 89.1 1813650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.4, Target = 86.3CPI = 74.4, Target = 86.3CPI = 74.4, Target = 86.3 76.5 66.9 74.4 7.5 86.3 88.3 4211850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 70.9CPI = 75, Target = 70.9CPI = 75, Target = 70.9 68.2 68.2 75.0 6.8 70.9 84.1 41108100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 74.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 84.8 74.0 68.4 74.4 6.0 84.8 87.0 588950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------22--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 68.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 68.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 68.2, Target = 87.6 78.8 64.9 68.2 3.3 87.6 89.4 713650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 66.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 66.7, Target = 86.5 76.9 63.2 66.7 3.5 86.5 88.5 1711750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.5, Target = 66.3CPI = 67.5, Target = 66.3CPI = 67.5, Target = 66.3 63.2 63.2 67.5 4.3 66.3 81.6 1710775On Target
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 65.7, Target = 85.8CPI = 65.7, Target = 85.8CPI = 65.7, Target = 85.8 75.7 63.0 65.7 2.7 85.8 87.9 248950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------22--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.7, Target = 82.9CPI = 66.7, Target = 82.9CPI = 66.7, Target = 82.9 70.7 79.7 66.7 -13.0 82.9 85.4 19510Declined
High needsCPI = 64.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 64.5, Target = 80.1CPI = 64.5, Target = 80.1 65.8 78.2 64.5 -13.7 80.1 82.9 40430Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.7, Target = 80.2CPI = 64.7, Target = 80.2CPI = 64.7, Target = 80.2 78.4 78.4 64.7 -13.7 80.2 89.2 49390Declined
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 64.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 64.2, Target = 79.2CPI = 64.2, Target = 79.2 64.4 75.9 64.2 -11.7 79.2 82.2 59370Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.6 2.913625 14.5 13.21360
High needs 1.1 1.711825 16.1 14.411825
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 1.910825 14.1 13.01080
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.28925 15.2 13.58925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--22---22-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.8 5.913625 17.7 21.31360
High needs 4.3 5.111725 19.4 23.11170
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.7 5.610725 20.0 22.41070
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino 3.8 3.4890 19.0 24.7890
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--22---22-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.9 3.9510 9.3 15.7510
High needs 16.1 2.3430 12.9 18.6430
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.2 2.6390 13.8 17.9390
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 18.5 0.0370 11.1 13.5370
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 32.0 52.5 20.5 51.0Yes86100Above Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 31.0 47.0 16.0 51.0Yes73100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 29.5 42.0 12.5 51.0Yes6575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 34.0 46.0 12.0 51.0Yes5975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 20.5 32.0 11.5 51.0Yes8675On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 18.5 32.0 13.5 51.0Yes7275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 20.0 32.0 12.0 51.0Yes6475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 21.0 29.0 8.0 51.0Yes5975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 62.0 60.02625
High needs 62.0 60.02625
EL and Former EL- 60.026-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15515499Yes15615599Yes5656100Yes
High needs135135100Yes13613599Yes4747100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged122122100Yes12312299Yes4242100Yes
EL and Former EL30---31---13---
Students w/ disabilities27---28---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---2---
Afr. Amer./Black20---20---6---
Hispanic/Latino10210199Yes10310299Yes4040100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25---25---7---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles