Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brooks School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Brooks School
Organization Information
District:Medford (01760000)School type:Elementary School
School:Brooks School (01760130)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.7, Target = 90.8CPI = 88.7, Target = 90.8CPI = 88.7, Target = 90.8 84.2 84.4 88.7 4.3 90.8 92.1 6524450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69, Target = 81.2CPI = 69, Target = 81.2CPI = 69, Target = 81.2 67.7 62.3 69.0 6.7 81.2 83.9 216350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.7, Target = 69.3CPI = 75.7, Target = 69.3CPI = 75.7, Target = 69.3 66.5 66.5 75.7 9.2 69.3 83.3 4538100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.3, Target = 73.3CPI = 53.3, Target = 73.3CPI = 53.3, Target = 73.3 54.2 48.3 53.3 5.0 73.3 77.1 203050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 80.6, Target = 87.1CPI = 80.6, Target = 87.1CPI = 80.6, Target = 87.1 77.9 70.4 80.6 10.2 87.1 89.0 792750Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 89.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 89.4, Target = 90.8 84.2 86.4 89.4 3.0 90.8 92.1 5818250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.8 79.0 79.1 83.1 4.0 87.8 89.5 3924450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 60.9, Target = 78.6CPI = 60.9, Target = 78.6CPI = 60.9, Target = 78.6 63.3 51.2 60.9 9.7 78.6 81.7 66250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 65.1, Target = 56.9CPI = 65.1, Target = 56.9CPI = 65.1, Target = 56.9 53.0 53.0 65.1 12.1 56.9 76.5 1238100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 49.1, Target = 72.6CPI = 49.1, Target = 72.6CPI = 49.1, Target = 72.6 53.1 38.8 49.1 10.3 72.6 76.6 132950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 66.7, Target = 81.1CPI = 66.7, Target = 81.1CPI = 66.7, Target = 81.1 67.6 59.3 66.7 7.4 81.1 83.8 272750Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.5 80.2 82.1 86.3 4.2 88.5 90.1 4018250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 91.1 84.7 85.2 81.3 -3.9 91.1 92.4 51960Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.3, Target = 92.3CPI = 84.3, Target = 92.3CPI = 84.3, Target = 92.3 86.8 86.1 84.3 -1.8 92.3 93.4 477025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.3 17.224425 4.3 6.12440
High needs 1.6 1.6630 15.9 20.6630
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.4 2.6380 7.3 10.5380
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0300 34.5 36.7300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 7.4 7.4270 11.1 11.1270
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 17.018225 3.8 6.01820
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.4 28.724425 13.3 10.224425
High needs 4.8 11.36225 44.4 32.36225
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.3 15.83825 43.9 26.33825
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 65.5 44.82925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 3.7 7.42725 33.3 22.22725
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.4 30.818225 12.0 8.218225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.1 20.8960 4.7 6.3960
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.4 20.0700 4.8 5.7700
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 50.0 59.0 9.0 51.0Yes17575On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 43.0 44.0 1.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-19--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 49.0 63.0 14.0 51.0Yes128100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 53.0 49.0 -4.0 51.0Yes17575On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 41.0 42.0 1.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-19--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 53.0 47.5 -5.5 51.0Yes12875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08-
High needs- 60.08-
EL and Former EL- 60.08-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students25724595Yes25724595Yes1019695Yes
High needs676496Yes676397Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged413995Yes413995Yes13---
EL and Former EL7---7---2---
Students w/ disabilities313097Yes312997Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---6---
Afr. Amer./Black292897Yes292897Yes10---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19118295Yes19118295Yes737096Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles