Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edgar F. Hooks Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Edgar A Hooks Elementary
Organization Information
District:Chelsea (00570000)School type:Elementary School
School:Edgar A Hooks Elementary (00570030)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.7, Target = 84.4CPI = 73.7, Target = 84.4CPI = 73.7, Target = 84.4 73.2 66.0 73.7 7.7 84.4 86.6 1321250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 83.9CPI = 70, Target = 83.9CPI = 70, Target = 83.9 72.4 64.1 70.0 5.9 83.9 86.2 2415450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.3, Target = 67.4CPI = 69.3, Target = 67.4CPI = 69.3, Target = 67.4 64.4 64.4 69.3 4.9 67.4 82.2 21128100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 66, Target = 81.6CPI = 66, Target = 81.6CPI = 66, Target = 81.6 68.4 56.9 66.0 9.1 81.6 84.2 375350Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.4, Target = 67.7CPI = 66.4, Target = 67.7CPI = 66.4, Target = 67.7 44.6 61.0 66.4 5.4 67.7 72.3 553550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 72.4, Target = 83.6CPI = 72.4, Target = 83.6CPI = 72.4, Target = 83.6 71.8 64.3 72.4 8.1 83.6 85.9 5018050Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 89.9CPI = 94.7, Target = 89.9CPI = 94.7, Target = 89.9 82.7 90.3 94.7 4.4 89.9 91.4 93212100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95, Target = 89.3CPI = 95, Target = 89.3CPI = 95, Target = 89.3 81.6 89.3 95.0 5.7 89.3 90.8 99154100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 94.9, Target = 89.9CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.9CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.9 89.0 89.0 94.9 5.9 89.9 94.5 99128100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 96.2, Target = 85CPI = 96.2, Target = 85CPI = 96.2, Target = 85 74.3 90.6 96.2 5.6 85.0 87.2 9953100Above Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 95, Target = 78.4CPI = 95, Target = 78.4CPI = 95, Target = 78.4 63.0 90.2 95.0 4.8 78.4 81.5 9935100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 94.9, Target = 89.4CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.4CPI = 94.9, Target = 89.4 81.8 90.8 94.9 4.1 89.4 90.9 99180100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.3 4.721225 14.8 13.221225
High needs 0.0 2.615425 14.6 14.91540
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.112825 15.4 14.81280
EL and Former EL 0.0 0.0530 15.0 20.8530
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0350 17.6 17.1350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 1.1 4.418025 16.8 14.418025
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.7 36.321225 0.5 0.52120
High needs 25.3 34.415425 0.7 0.615425
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.6 33.612825 0.8 0.81280
EL and Former EL 25.0 34.05325 0.0 1.9530
Students w/ disabilities 30.3 34.33525 3.0 2.9350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 25.4 35.018025 0.5 0.61800
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51 48.0 74.0 26.0 51.0Yes100100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 49.0 69.5 20.5 51.0Yes68100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 47.5 70.0 22.5 51.0Yes55100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51 44.5 74.0 29.5 51.0Yes88100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 65.0 60.5 -4.5 51.0Yes100100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 66.5 68.0 1.5 51.0Yes68100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 66.0 60.0 -6.0 51.0Yes55100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 63.5 62.0 -1.5 51.0Yes88100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-6--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 48.0 60.01560
High needs 48.0 60.01560
EL and Former EL 48.0 60.01560
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students213213100Yes213213100Yes----
High needs155155100Yes155155100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged129129100Yes129129100Yes----
EL and Former EL5454100Yes5454100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities3636100Yes3636100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3-------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black11---11-------
Hispanic/Latino181181100Yes181181100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White14---14-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles