Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amigos School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Amigos School

Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Amigos School (00490006)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 93.9 89.6 93.9 95.2 1.3 93.9 94.8 92192100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88.1, Target = 90CPI = 88.1, Target = 90CPI = 88.1, Target = 90 82.9 83.3 88.1 4.8 90.0 91.5 916175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.3, Target = 83CPI = 85.3, Target = 83CPI = 85.3, Target = 83 81.5 81.5 85.3 3.8 83.0 90.8 8329100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 86.8, Target = 86.6CPI = 86.8, Target = 86.6 77.0 83.1 86.8 3.7 86.6 88.5 983875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 91.5, Target = 90.9CPI = 91.5, Target = 90.9 84.4 86.6 91.5 4.9 90.9 92.2 938275On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5 97.5 98.2 97.1 -1.1 98.5 98.8 9577100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 88.7 80.6 89.2 90.8 1.6 88.7 90.3 87188100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78.6, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.6, Target = 81.7CPI = 78.6, Target = 81.7 68.6 73.1 78.6 5.5 81.7 84.3 846250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.7, Target = 74.5CPI = 76.7, Target = 74.5CPI = 76.7, Target = 74.5 72.2 72.2 76.7 4.5 74.5 86.1 7630100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.7, Target = 75.9CPI = 73.7, Target = 75.9CPI = 73.7, Target = 75.9 58.6 67.7 73.7 6.0 75.9 79.3 913875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 85.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 85.4, Target = 83.8 72.3 80.5 85.4 4.9 83.8 86.2 9082100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 96.8CPI = 96, Target = 96.8 94.5 97.9 96.0 -1.9 96.8 97.3 9375100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92, Target = 86.7CPI = 92, Target = 86.7CPI = 92, Target = 86.7 77.2 86.2 92.0 5.8 86.7 88.6 9766100Above Target
High needs  62.0---- 81.0-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino  65.6---- 82.8-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  96.7---- 98.4-25--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.6 43.819225 2.2 1.019225
High needs 13.0 26.26125 7.4 3.36125
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 24.12925 3.7 3.4290
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 12.9 21.13825 6.5 5.33825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino 19.2 30.58225 5.5 2.48225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--22---22-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.1 53.27725 0.0 0.07725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 46.7 54.318825 6.7 4.818825
High needs 18.5 27.46225 16.7 14.56225
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.8 20.03025 11.1 16.7300
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities 19.4 26.33825 22.6 18.43825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino 30.1 36.68225 12.3 9.88225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--21---21-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 60.0 69.37525 1.4 0.07525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.5 39.46625 6.1 1.56625
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--26---26-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--25---25-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 65.0 60.5 -4.5 51.0Yes142100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 68.0 65.0 -3.0 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 68.0 61.0 -7.0 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 60.0 60.5 0.5 51.0Yes58100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 64.0 58.0 -6.0 51.0No5575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 66.0 66.5 0.5 51.0No138100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 54.0 56.0 2.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 64.0 56.0 -8.0 51.0No3175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 63.0 56.0 -7.0 51.0Yes5875On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 68.0 70.0 2.0 51.0No53100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011-
High needs- 60.011-
EL and Former EL- 60.011-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20019598Yes20019196Yes686799Yes
High needs656498Yes6565100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged323197Yes3232100Yes9---
EL and Former EL16---16---5---
Students w/ disabilities3838100Yes3838100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---5---
Hispanic/Latino888597Yes888597Yes2727100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.22---22---9---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White797797Yes797595Yes2525100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles