Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary E Flaherty School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mary E Flaherty School

Organization Information
District:Braintree (00400000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mary E Flaherty School (00400020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.5, Target = 96.1CPI = 95.5, Target = 96.1 93.3 95.4 95.5 0.1 96.1 96.7 97204100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 88.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 88.5, Target = 89.7 82.4 90.1 88.5 -1.6 89.7 91.2 967675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.1, Target = 93CPI = 87.1, Target = 93CPI = 87.1, Target = 93 92.4 92.4 87.1 -5.3 93.0 96.2 923175On Target
EL and Former EL -------20--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 88.2 79.8 86.7 85.4 -1.3 88.2 89.9 964875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.2, Target = 92.9CPI = 96.2, Target = 92.9CPI = 96.2, Target = 92.9 90.5 93.8 96.2 2.4 92.9 95.3 7139100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 97CPI = 95.2, Target = 97CPI = 95.2, Target = 97 94.8 95.6 95.2 -0.4 97.0 97.4 92151100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93, Target = 95.3CPI = 93, Target = 95.3CPI = 93, Target = 95.3 92.0 88.4 93.0 4.6 95.3 96.0 8520475On Target
High needsCPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2 83.2 77.6 87.8 10.2 90.2 91.6 927675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 87.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 87.1, Target = 80.6 78.8 78.8 87.1 8.3 80.6 89.4 9031100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------20--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 83.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 90.1 83.0 71.3 83.9 12.6 90.1 91.5 944875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.8, Target = 91.1CPI = 96.8, Target = 91.1CPI = 96.8, Target = 91.1 88.1 92.0 96.8 4.8 91.1 94.1 6139100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.8 92.8 88.2 92.7 4.5 95.8 96.4 7915175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.5, Target = 97.4CPI = 98.5, Target = 97.4CPI = 98.5, Target = 97.4 95.5 93.1 98.5 5.4 97.4 97.8 9967100Above Target
High needsCPI = 99, Target = 93.1CPI = 99, Target = 93.1CPI = 99, Target = 93.1 88.1 83.1 99.0 15.9 93.1 94.1 9925100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.1, Target = 97.7CPI = 98.1, Target = 97.7 96.1 93.8 98.1 4.3 97.7 98.1 9953100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.6 31.920425 1.9 0.020425
High needs 6.6 9.27625 3.9 0.07625
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.1 6.5310 3.0 0.03125
EL and Former EL--20---20-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 8.34825 6.4 0.04825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 7.1 28.23925 0.0 0.03925
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.5 35.115125 2.4 0.015125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.9 37.320425 5.6 1.020425
High needs 11.8 15.87625 14.5 1.37625
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.2 16.1310 12.1 3.23125
EL and Former EL--20---20-
Students w/ disabilities 6.4 10.44825 23.4 2.14825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 32.1 38.53925 7.1 0.03925
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.7 36.415125 4.7 1.315125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 42.5 35.8670 3.4 0.06725
High needs 19.4 8.0250 9.7 0.02525
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.0 43.4530 2.9 0.05325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 70.0 70.0 0.0 51.0No120100Above Target
High needsSGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51 79.0 71.0 -8.0 51.0No40100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 70.0 70.0 0.0 51.0No92100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 44.0 55.0 11.0 51.0Yes12175On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 47.0 57.0 10.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 47.5 57.0 9.5 51.0Yes2375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-19--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 43.0 57.0 14.0 51.0Yes9375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019-
High needs- 60.019-
EL and Former EL- 60.019-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students207207100Yes207207100Yes6868100Yes
High needs7878100Yes7878100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3232100Yes3232100Yes8---
EL and Former EL21---21---6---
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3939100Yes3939100Yes10---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White154154100Yes154154100Yes5454100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles