Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mendell Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Ellis Mendell

Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Ellis Mendell (00350100)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.4, Target = 80CPI = 74.4, Target = 80CPI = 74.4, Target = 80 65.7 68.4 74.4 6.0 80.0 82.9 158050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.5, Target = 80CPI = 65.5, Target = 80CPI = 65.5, Target = 80 65.7 63.1 65.5 2.4 80.0 82.9 125550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 65.9, Target = 67.4CPI = 65.9, Target = 67.4CPI = 65.9, Target = 67.4 64.4 64.4 65.9 1.5 67.4 82.2 124450Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.6, Target = 67.5CPI = 54.6, Target = 67.5CPI = 54.6, Target = 67.5 44.3 56.7 54.6 -2.1 67.5 72.2 242725No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 71.9, Target = 82CPI = 71.9, Target = 82CPI = 71.9, Target = 82 69.2 66.0 71.9 5.9 82.0 84.6 473250Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------20--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.2, Target = 76.3CPI = 72.2, Target = 76.3CPI = 72.2, Target = 76.3 59.3 67.4 72.2 4.8 76.3 79.7 118150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.9, Target = 76.3CPI = 62.9, Target = 76.3CPI = 62.9, Target = 76.3 59.3 65.4 62.9 -2.5 76.3 79.7 9560Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 68.3 65.4 65.4 63.3 -2.1 68.3 82.7 94525No Change
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.9, Target = 66.9CPI = 50.9, Target = 66.9CPI = 50.9, Target = 66.9 43.2 56.7 50.9 -5.8 66.9 71.6 15270Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 64.4, Target = 78CPI = 64.4, Target = 78CPI = 64.4, Target = 78 62.2 63.8 64.4 0.6 78.0 81.1 193350Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------20--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------14--
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 6.3 12.58025 15.0 13.8800
High needs 1.6 1.85525 18.0 20.0550
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.1 0.0440 14.9 18.2440
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0270 26.7 33.3270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 2.6 3.13225 17.9 6.33225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 13.9 21.08125 17.7 24.7810
High needs 6.7 7.1560 18.3 33.9560
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.5 4.4450 19.1 33.3450
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 6.7 7.42725 23.3 55.6270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 5.3 6.13325 21.1 27.3330
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--14---14-
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 37.5 34.5 -3.0 51.0Yes4275On Target
High needsSGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51 31.5 23.0 -8.5 51.0Yes3375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51 31.0 19.0 -12.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 42.5 45.5 3.0 51.0Yes2075On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0-4--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51SGP = 24, Target = 51 32.5 24.0 -8.5 51.0Yes4375On Target
High needsSGP = 22.5, Target = 51SGP = 22.5, Target = 51SGP = 22.5, Target = 51 34.0 22.5 -11.5 51.0No340Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 22.5, Target = 51SGP = 22.5, Target = 51SGP = 22.5, Target = 51 34.0 22.5 -11.5 51.0No280Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 31.0 30.0 -1.0 51.0No210Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0-4--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 70.5 60.03025
High needs 70.5 60.03025
EL and Former EL- 60.030-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students858499Yes8585100Yes16---
High needs605998Yes6060100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged494898Yes4949100Yes11---
EL and Former EL16---16---5---
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes2929100Yes5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black25---25---5---
Hispanic/Latino353497Yes3535100Yes9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White20---20-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles