Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lyon K-8 School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lyon K-8
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Lyon K-8 (00350004)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6 92.5 90.4 90.7 0.3 95.6 96.3 779750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 87.7, Target = 94CPI = 87.7, Target = 94CPI = 87.7, Target = 94 89.7 87.7 87.7 0.0 94.0 94.9 905575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.3, Target = 85.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 85.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 85.9 84.6 84.6 89.3 4.7 85.9 92.3 8928100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.8, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.8, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.8, Target = 93.4 88.6 84.6 82.8 -1.8 93.4 94.3 943275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino  81.8---- 90.9-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.1, Target = 98.3CPI = 94.1, Target = 98.3CPI = 94.1, Target = 98.3 97.1 92.9 94.1 1.2 98.3 98.6 793875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 93.5CPI = 83, Target = 93.5CPI = 83, Target = 93.5 88.9 84.4 83.0 -1.4 93.5 94.5 709725No Change
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 91.8CPI = 78.2, Target = 91.8CPI = 78.2, Target = 91.8 85.9 79.7 78.2 -1.5 91.8 93.0 835525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.8, Target = 77.1CPI = 76.8, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 76.8 1.8 77.1 87.5 772875On Target
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 93.2 88.3 82.4 77.3 -5.1 93.2 94.2 943275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino  78.4---- 89.2-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.9, Target = 97CPI = 82.9, Target = 97CPI = 82.9, Target = 97 94.9 88.5 82.9 -5.6 97.0 97.5 51380Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65.9, Target = 84.3CPI = 65.9, Target = 84.3CPI = 65.9, Target = 84.3 73.1 72.7 65.9 -6.8 84.3 86.6 51330Declined
High needs  72.6---- 86.3-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------12--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.5 18.69725 2.1 2.1970
High needs 6.8 16.45525 3.4 1.85525
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.8 14.32825 3.8 0.02825
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 8.8 9.4320 2.9 3.1320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.4 18.43825 0.0 2.6380
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.3 28.9970 8.3 12.4970
High needs 27.1 23.6550 11.9 16.4550
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 28.62825 11.5 17.9280
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 26.5 21.9320 8.8 15.6320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.5 26.3380 5.1 10.5380
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 3.03325 9.1 9.1330
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--12---12-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 63.0 54.0 -9.0 51.0No7775On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 53.0 45.5 -7.5 51.0No4450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 67.0 45.0 -22.0 51.0No2750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 75.0 65.0 -10.0 51.0Yes32100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 64.0 52.0 -12.0 51.0No7775On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 66.0 51.0 -15.0 51.0No4475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 69.5 53.0 -16.5 51.0No2775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 64.0 51.5 -12.5 51.0No3275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9999100Yes9999100Yes3535100Yes
High needs5757100Yes5757100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes11---
EL and Former EL15---15---7---
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes3434100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---3---
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---4---
Hispanic/Latino3030100Yes3030100Yes12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3939100Yes3939100Yes13---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles