Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gateway Regional Junior High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Gateway Regional Middle School
Organization Information
District:Gateway (06720000)School type:Elementary School
School:Gateway Regional Middle School (06720410)Grades served:05,06
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 85.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 85.6, Target = 92.6 87.3 81.8 85.6 3.8 92.6 93.7 5012350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 77.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 77.5, Target = 88.2 79.7 71.9 77.5 5.6 88.2 89.9 595050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.6, Target = 79.4CPI = 83.6, Target = 79.4CPI = 83.6, Target = 79.4 77.5 77.5 83.6 6.1 79.4 88.8 8235100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.7, Target = 92.5CPI = 85.7, Target = 92.5CPI = 85.7, Target = 92.5 87.2 83.4 85.7 2.3 92.5 93.6 3611550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.5, Target = 88.5CPI = 81.5, Target = 88.5CPI = 81.5, Target = 88.5 80.3 77.6 81.5 3.9 88.5 90.2 3212350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72, Target = 84.7CPI = 72, Target = 84.7CPI = 72, Target = 84.7 73.8 67.3 72.0 4.7 84.7 86.9 325050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.6, Target = 74.8CPI = 78.6, Target = 74.8CPI = 78.6, Target = 74.8 72.5 72.5 78.6 6.1 74.8 86.3 6035100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83, Target = 88.6CPI = 83, Target = 88.6CPI = 83, Target = 88.6 80.5 79.3 83.0 3.7 88.6 90.3 2411550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.9, Target = 87.9CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.9CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.9 79.2 75.7 72.9 -2.8 87.9 89.6 28600Declined
High needsCPI = 63.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 63.5, Target = 86.3CPI = 63.5, Target = 86.3 76.5 72.1 63.5 -8.6 86.3 88.3 37260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 74.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 74.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 74.1, Target = 87.6 78.7 76.9 74.1 -2.8 87.6 89.4 16560Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.7 7.31230 11.3 7.312325
High needs 12.3 4.0500 21.5 16.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.0 5.7350 14.0 17.1350
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.4 7.811525 10.0 7.811525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.9 22.812325 13.2 13.81230
High needs 10.8 20.05025 23.1 24.0500
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.0 22.93525 18.0 14.33525
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.1 24.311525 12.1 13.91150
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.9 6.7600 5.6 15.0600
High needs 5.9 7.72625 8.8 23.1260
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 7.1560 6.0 14.3560
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.0 57.0 8.0 51.0Yes11975On Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 43.5 62.0 18.5 51.0Yes47100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 46.0 64.0 18.0 51.0Yes34100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 49.0 56.0 7.0 51.0Yes11275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 50.5 61.5 11.0 51.0Yes120100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 41.0 60.0 19.0 51.0Yes48100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 41.0 61.0 20.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 53.0 62.0 9.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12612599Yes12612599Yes6161100Yes
High needs525198Yes525198Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged363597Yes363597Yes18---
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities24---24---13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino7---7---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White117117100Yes117117100Yes5757100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles