Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lee Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lee Elementary
Organization Information
District:Lee (01500000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lee Elementary (01500025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.1, Target = 91.8CPI = 81.1, Target = 91.8CPI = 81.1, Target = 91.8 86.0 79.8 81.1 1.3 91.8 93.0 3016950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.9, Target = 88.3CPI = 70.9, Target = 88.3CPI = 70.9, Target = 88.3 79.9 64.3 70.9 6.6 88.3 90.0 287450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.4, Target = 70.6CPI = 75.4, Target = 70.6CPI = 75.4, Target = 70.6 67.9 67.9 75.4 7.5 70.6 84.0 4359100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 57.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 57.7, Target = 83.5 71.7 47.6 57.7 10.1 83.5 85.9 302650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.1, Target = 92.5CPI = 81.1, Target = 92.5CPI = 81.1, Target = 92.5 87.2 81.0 81.1 0.1 92.5 93.6 1714350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 88CPI = 83.9, Target = 88CPI = 83.9, Target = 88 79.4 79.1 83.9 4.8 88.0 89.7 4316950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 82.8CPI = 75, Target = 82.8CPI = 75, Target = 82.8 70.5 64.9 75.0 10.1 82.8 85.3 467450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.4, Target = 70.9CPI = 78.4, Target = 70.9CPI = 78.4, Target = 70.9 68.3 68.3 78.4 10.1 70.9 84.2 5859100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.5, Target = 75.9CPI = 61.5, Target = 75.9CPI = 61.5, Target = 75.9 58.7 49.2 61.5 12.3 75.9 79.4 412650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 88.7 80.6 80.3 84.1 3.8 88.7 90.3 2914350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 82.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 82.5, Target = 89.7 82.3 85.7 82.5 -3.2 89.7 91.2 55500Declined
High needs  70.2---- 85.1-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.3, Target = 89.9CPI = 83.3, Target = 89.9CPI = 83.3, Target = 89.9 82.7 90.8 83.3 -7.5 89.9 91.4 41420Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.1 8.31690 13.6 8.916925
High needs 8.5 4.1740 29.3 16.27425
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.5 5.1590 23.8 13.65925
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 0.0260 48.4 19.22625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.5 8.41430 11.7 7.014325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.6 30.816925 11.1 7.116925
High needs 18.3 13.5740 24.4 13.57425
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.6 16.9590 19.0 10.25925
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 3.8260 48.4 26.92625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.2 30.11430 10.5 7.014325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.4 16.0500 8.2 10.0500
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.7 16.7420 2.6 9.5420
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 45.0 49.0 4.0 51.0No13550Below Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 38.0 49.0 11.0 51.0No6275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 38.0 48.0 10.0 51.0No4875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 44.0 50.0 6.0 51.0No11450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 47.5 67.0 19.5 51.0Yes135100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 39.0 67.0 28.0 51.0Yes62100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 36.5 68.0 31.5 51.0Yes48100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 49.0 66.0 17.0 51.0Yes114100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09-
High needs- 60.09-
EL and Former EL- 60.09-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students177177100Yes176176100Yes5353100Yes
High needs8181100Yes8080100Yes2727100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6565100Yes6464100Yes22---
EL and Former EL6---6---3---
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White148148100Yes147147100Yes4343100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles