Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lunenburg

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lunenburg

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lunenburg (01620000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Partially meeting targets

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-04-04-
Science achievement34----24----
Achievement total71267.56867.561247.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-24-14-
Mathematics growth34-34-34-14-
Growth total5822.55822.55822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------14----
Additional indicators total0410.00410.05810.00410.0
Weighted total5.910.3-5.27.6-6.510.7-3.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 57%-68%-61%-42%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan63%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
52%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-34-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement44-14-
Achievement total61267.541247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---04-
High school completion total---41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion---44-
Additional indicators total0410.08810.0
Weighted total5.010.3-4.410.7-
Percentage of possible points 49%-41%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan49%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
41%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.6 500.3 0.7 501.4 7902Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 478.6 481.6 3.0 483.0 1522Improved Below Target
High needs 488.3 488.7 0.4 489.8 2332Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 144--
EL and Former EL---- 27--
Students w/ disabilities---- 122--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 63--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 5--
White 500.2 500.8 0.6 502.2 6782Improved Below Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 99.3 0.8 100.0 1054Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 95.0 98.0 3.0 97.0 254Exceeded Target
High needs 94.0 97.1 3.1 95.9 263Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 99.2 0.9 99.8 934Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.7 500.9 0.2 502.4 7882Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 478.8 483.4 4.6 481.4 1524Exceeded Target
High needs 489.7 488.3 -1.4 491.2 2320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 144--
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities---- 122--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 62--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 5--
White 501.7 501.7 0.0 503.4 6771No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.5 92.6 -3.9 98.3 1050Declined
Lowest Performing 90.8 74.0 -16.8 93.6 250Declined
High needs 87.1 77.9 -9.2 89.6 260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.3 92.7 -3.6 98.1 930Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.5 79.1 2.6 78.3 2713Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 63.8 69.4 5.6 66.1 764Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 47--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 40--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 76.9 79.9 3.0 78.7 2293Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.5 95.0 0.5 96.3 1002Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.6 83.3 -2.3 87.9 241No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.8 94.9 1.1 95.6 893Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.6 50.0 6442Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.7 50.0 1522Below Target
High needs 44.5 50.0 1772Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 114--
EL and Former EL-- 18--
Students w/ disabilities-- 86--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 4--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 49--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 4--
White 47.7 50.0 5572Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.5 50.0 922Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.0 50.0 221Below Target
High needs 45.9 50.0 212Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.0 50.0 842Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.2 50.0 6443Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.3 50.0 1523Met Target
High needs 47.9 50.0 1762Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 113--
EL and Former EL-- 18--
Students w/ disabilities-- 85--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 4--
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 10--
Hispanic/Latino-- 49--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 4--
White 54.1 50.0 5573Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.5 50.0 923Met Target
Lowest Performing 30.2 50.0 221Below Target
High needs 43.6 50.0 212Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.3 50.0 843Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.9 96.0 3.1 94.9 1014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 82.4 90.3 7.9 86.5 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.2 98.9 5.7 95.3 874Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.4 96.0 -0.4 98.0 993Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.0 88.2 -1.8 93.5 340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.1 96.6 0.5 97.9 883Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.5 -0.3 1.0 4333Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.2 2.3 -1.1 1.1 860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 57--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 3803Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.3 6.3 -1.0 4.2 1,0650Declined
Lowest Performing 6.3 7.2 -0.9 4.2 1520Declined
High needs 10.9 12.1 -1.2 9.0 3300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 155--
EL and Former EL---- 50--
Students w/ disabilities---- 162--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino---- 90--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 6--
White 4.9 5.7 -0.8 3.9 9000Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.0 7.0 3.0 8.9 4544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 3.3 16.0 -12.7 1.2 250Declined
High needs 23.6 12.8 10.8 21.7 1174Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 58--
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 55--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 9.9 7.2 2.7 8.9 4054Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.2 64.5 -0.7 69.8 2111No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 17.9 26.1 8.2 24.9 464Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 66.1 67.2 1.1 71.2 1862Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 902 898100Yes 1 902 89799Yes 1 377 377100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 266 26298Yes 1 266 26298Yes 1 103 103100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 165 16399Yes 1 165 16399Yes 1 65 65100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 35 3394No 1 35 3396Yes 2 15----
Students w/ disabilities 136 13398Yes 1 136 13398Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 4---- 4---- 2----
Asian 13---- 13---- 8----
Afr. Amer./Black 15---- 15---- 10----
Hispanic/Latino 68 6799Yes 1 68 6697Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 6---- 6---- 3----
White 772 771100Yes 1 772 770100Yes 1 322 322100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Advanced Community Experience ProgramInsufficient data
Lunenburg HighNot requiring assistance or intervention
Lunenburg Middle SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Lunenburg Primary SchoolInsufficient data
Turkey Hill Elementary SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles