PARENT FEEDBACK OPPORTUNITY! DESE is redesigning the Schools Near Me search engine to make information more accessible and easier to use. Please take our 5 min Survey to let us know what features would be most useful to you as a parent. Thank you.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2019 Official Accountability Report - Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical (08250000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
71% - Substantial progress toward targets-

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%67%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
71%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement34-44-
Achievement total101240.081267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-14-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total61220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total1410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total3810.04410.0
Weighted total6.810.0-6.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 68%-65%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage67%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34-44-
Achievement total101240.0121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate24----
Annual dropout rate14----
High school completion total31220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total8810.00410.0
Weighted total6.810.0-9.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 68%-87%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%68%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
72%
Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total101247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate14-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total51220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total7.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 68%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage68%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate24-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total61220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total7810.0
Weighted total8.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 78%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.2 0.1 100.0 5224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.0 96.8 -0.2 99.0 1321No Change
High needs 98.7 98.6 -0.1 100.0 2794Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.2 98.9 -0.3 100.0 2454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 96.7 92.4 -4.3 99.1 330Declined
Students w/ disabilities 95.8 98.6 2.8 97.7 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 99.0 96.8 -2.2 100.0 391No Change
Hispanic/Latino 98.6 98.8 0.2 100.0 1424Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 254Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.2 99.6 0.4 100.0 3104Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 95.5 0.6 96.6 5223Met Target
Lowest Performing 80.2 83.0 2.8 82.9 1323Met Target
High needs 92.7 94.0 1.3 95.0 2793Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.0 94.9 0.9 96.8 2452Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 84.8 90.2 5.4 88.6 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 82.2 82.7 0.5 84.8 522Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 94.0 91.0 -3.0 97.4 390Declined
Hispanic/Latino 94.7 96.1 1.4 97.9 1423Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 88.8 94.0 5.2 90.6 254Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 95.8 0.5 97.0 3103Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 93.7 2.4 93.0 5103Met Target
Lowest Performing 73.1 79.9 6.8 76.6 1324Exceeded Target
High needs 88.0 91.1 3.1 90.6 2723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.4 91.6 1.2 93.2 2392Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities 72.3 80.4 8.1 75.0 514Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 90.6 87.5 -3.1 92.3 380Declined
Hispanic/Latino 89.2 92.5 3.3 92.3 1343Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.1 95.0 2.9 94.0 3073Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 4643Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 35.8 1171Low Growth
High needs 50.6 2503Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.1 2193Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL 53.1 313Typical Growth - High
Students w/ disabilities 46.2 482Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 53.0 353Typical Growth - High
Hispanic/Latino 51.5 1283Typical Growth - High
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 53.3 2773Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 59.9 4643Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 50.1 1173Typical Growth - High
High needs 61.3 2504Exceeded Typical Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.6 2194Exceeded Typical Growth
EL and Former EL 66.8 314Exceeded Typical Growth
Students w/ disabilities 60.6 484Exceeded Typical Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 66.0 354Exceeded Typical Growth
Hispanic/Latino 64.5 1284Exceeded Typical Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 57.9 2773Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.8 90.9 1.1 91.6 5392Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.5 87.2 -0.3 90.9 2961No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.1 87.4 0.3 91.6 2692Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 76.1 82.5 6.4 81.8 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black 92.5 87.5 -5.0 100.0 480Declined
Hispanic/Latino 83.0 86.9 3.9 84.8 1224Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 85.0 95.2 10.2 86.8 214Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.0 92.7 0.7 93.8 3422Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.3 91.3 -3.0 96.0 5390Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.5 89.4 -4.1 97.4 3680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.1 88.9 -4.2 97.4 3410Declined
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 91.5 80.3 -11.2 96.6 710Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 93.2 92.5 -0.7 97.7 530Declined
Hispanic/Latino 93.4 86.6 -6.8 95.1 1120Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.8 93.1 -1.7 96.6 3500Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.9 1.4 -0.5 1.7 2,1534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 1.8 -0.7 2.3 1,0364Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.5 2.0 -0.5 2.3 8704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 3.3 3.0 -0.3 3.0 673Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 2.9 0.0 2.6 2401No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 11--
Asian---- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black 1.6 1.1 -0.5 1.4 1744Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 3.5 1.9 -1.6 3.2 4654Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2.6 1.2 -1.4 2.3 834Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.5 1.4 -0.1 1.4 1,4023Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 34.4 33.3 -1.1 39.9 691No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 34.4 33.3 -1.1 39.9 691No Change
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.9 7.2 1.3 4.6 2,1453Met Target
Lowest Performing 11.9 5.3 -6.6 7.1 1324Exceeded Target
High needs 7.8 10.6 2.8 5.5 1,0690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.6 11.5 1.9 5.0 8290Declined
EL and Former EL 6.8 10.5 3.7 3.0 1710Declined
Students w/ disabilities 7.8 11.2 3.4 4.2 1780Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 9--
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 5.1 6.2 1.1 2.1 1783Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 6.9 8.4 1.5 3.1 4883Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9.6 9.7 0.1 8.3 931No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 5.5 6.8 1.3 4.1 1,3563Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.2 49.6 -30.6 84.6 1,0400Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 73.7 44.9 -28.8 80.8 5080Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.6 44.0 -33.6 85.3 4300Declined
EL and Former EL 58.6 60.4 1.8 63.0 532Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 41.0 -10.9 59.3 1170Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black 80.5 44.2 -36.3 86.1 860Declined
Hispanic/Latino 79.6 53.3 -26.3 86.1 1950Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 83.8 45.9 -37.9 88.2 370Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.0 49.1 -30.9 85.0 7090Declined

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 522 522100Yes 1 522 522100Yes 1 522 522100Yes 1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 279 279 279 279 279 279 837 837100Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 245 245 245 245 245 245 735 735100Yes1
EL and Former EL 33 33 33 33 33 33 99 99100Yes1
Students w/ disabilities 52 52 52 52 52 52 156 156100Yes1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3 3 3 3 3 3 9----
Asian 3 3 3 3 3 3 9----
Afr. Amer./Black 39 39 39 39 39 39 117 117100Yes1
Hispanic/Latino 142 142 142 142 142 142 426 426100Yes1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 25 25 25 25 25 25 75 75100Yes1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 310 310 310 310 310 310 930 930100Yes1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Gr New Bedford Vocational TechnicalNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles