Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Chesterfield-Goshen

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Chesterfield-Goshen

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Chesterfield-Goshen (06320000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
42% - Moderate progress toward targets-

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage84%15%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
42%
Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-04-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement------
Achievement total0867.50867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-14-
Growth total3822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total1.17.6-1.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 15%-15%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage15%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total5867.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total5.57.6-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 72%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage66%15%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
35%
Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total1.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 15%-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage15%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement---
Achievement total5867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 66%-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage66%

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 497.7 -5.2 503.9 620Declined
Lowest Performing 485.3 483.8 -1.5 489.4 200Declined
High needs 496.1 490.3 -5.8 497.3 350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.3 498.4 -4.9 504.3 580Declined

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.1 490.1 -7.0 498.4 620Declined
Lowest Performing 477.7 475.6 -2.1 481.4 200Declined
High needs 490.1 486.4 -3.7 491.4 350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.4 491.4 -6.0 498.9 580Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students---- 12--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 5--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 4--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 45.0 472Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 44.0 202Typical Growth - Low
High needs 41.8 272Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged- 13--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 46.4 432Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 36.0 471Low Growth
Lowest Performing 35.5 201Low Growth
High needs 38.1 271Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged- 13--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 36.9 431Low Growth

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.7 1.0 -3.7 3.4 1024Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 5.6 0.0 -5.6 3.0 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.0 1.0 -3.0 2.6 964Exceeded Target

Assessment participation - All students
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 62 62100Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1 12----

Assessment participation - Subgroups
Group English language arts Mathematics Science Overall
Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Enrolled Assessed Total Enrolled Total Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
High needs 35 35 35 35 5 5 75 75100Yes1
Econ. Disadvantaged 18 18 18 18 4 4 40----
EL and Former EL-----------
Students w/ disabilities 21 21 21 21 1 1 43 43100Yes1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1 1 1 1-- 2----
Asian-----------
Afr. Amer./Black 1 1 1 1-- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 2 2 2 2 1 1 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----------
White 58 58 58 58 11 11 127 127100Yes1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
New Hingham Regional ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles