Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Argosy Collegiate Charter School (District)

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Argosy Collegiate Charter School (District)

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Argosy Collegiate Charter School (District) (35090000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08,09

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low participation rate: EL and former EL
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
25% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-04-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total21267.52867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total3822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total2.010.3-2.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 19%-30%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total31267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total2.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 26%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage26%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.0 486.5 -2.5 491.0 3120Declined
Lowest Performing 467.7 466.9 -0.8 473.0 460Declined
High needs 483.2 482.3 -0.9 485.2 2160Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.5 483.0 -1.5 486.1 1790Declined
EL and Former EL 476.7 474.1 -2.6 478.3 820Declined
Students w/ disabilities 471.2 469.8 -1.4 473.0 650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 488.4 484.2 -4.2 490.0 230Declined
Hispanic/Latino 480.0 478.8 -1.2 481.7 480Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 491.1 488.8 -2.3 493.2 2140Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.0 488.9 0.9 489.8 3132Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 466.3 466.4 0.1 469.6 462Improved Below Target
High needs 483.2 485.4 2.2 485.1 2173Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.3 485.8 1.5 485.7 1793Met Target
EL and Former EL 477.4 478.6 1.2 479.2 822Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 471.8 473.1 1.3 473.9 662Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 492.5 487.5 -5.0 494.3 230Declined
Hispanic/Latino 481.1 481.5 0.4 482.7 472Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 489.5 490.8 1.3 491.8 2162Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.8 50.9 -6.9 60.7 1070Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.4 44.4 -6.0 53.5 720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.9 45.4 -6.5 54.4 600Declined
EL and Former EL 42.7 34.1 -8.6 46.0 220Declined
Students w/ disabilities 37.0 43.1 6.1 40.5 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 61.0 52.5 -8.5 64.2 800Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 39.0 50.0 2831Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.9 50.0 442Below Target
High needs 37.3 50.0 1921Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.1 50.0 1571Below Target
EL and Former EL 38.2 50.0 721Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 41.9 50.0 582Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 33.5 50.0 211Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 40.9 50.0 422Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 39.5 50.0 1961Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.8 50.0 2812Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.1 50.0 442Below Target
High needs 43.3 50.0 1902Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.0 50.0 1552Below Target
EL and Former EL 41.3 50.0 712Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 40.5 50.0 582Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 40.7 50.0 212Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 37.3 50.0 411Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 46.4 50.0 1952Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.0 14.2 -2.2 10.1 3230Declined
Lowest Performing 10.2 30.4 -20.2 5.5 460Declined
High needs 13.6 17.8 -4.2 11.3 2250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.4 20.7 -5.3 13.0 1690Declined
EL and Former EL 9.4 20.9 -11.5 5.7 860Declined
Students w/ disabilities 15.8 26.1 -10.3 11.5 690Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 12.9 8.0 4.9 9.0 254Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 13.3 25.9 -12.6 9.9 540Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 12.1 12.5 -0.4 9.5 2161No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 313 30698Yes 1 314 313100Yes 1 108 10799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 217 21097Yes 1 218 217100Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 180 17698Yes 1 180 17999Yes 1 61 6098Yes 1
EL and Former EL 82 7694No 2 82 82100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 65 65100Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 1----
Asian 7---- 7---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 23 2296Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 4----
Hispanic/Latino 48 4696Yes 1 48 4798Yes 1 16----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 17---- 17---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 215 21299Yes 1 216 216100Yes 1 80 80100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Argosy Collegiate Charter SchoolRequiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles