Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational Technical (08760000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
73% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total101247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total3810.00410.0
Weighted total8.210.7-7.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 77%-68%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage73%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24-
Extended engagement rate24-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total7.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.6 0.4 99.6 2644Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.8 95.0 1.2 95.6 653Met Target
High needs 96.3 97.1 0.8 98.3 943Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.7 97.8 0.1 100.0 684Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 91.8 93.1 1.3 94.3 363Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 96.6 97.8 1.2 98.8 234Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 98.6 0.3 99.6 2344Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.7 92.1 1.4 92.4 2653Met Target
Lowest Performing 66.8 70.1 3.3 69.6 673Met Target
High needs 83.9 87.1 3.2 86.0 953Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.8 89.5 1.7 90.9 692Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 74.5 75.7 1.2 77.5 362Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino 83.0 87.0 4.0 85.6 234Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.7 92.7 1.0 93.3 2353Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 93.6 2.3 93.0 2583Met Target
Lowest Performing 73.3 78.7 5.4 77.6 673Met Target
High needs 85.2 89.5 4.3 88.0 934Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.5 91.8 4.3 90.4 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 73.8 78.5 4.7 76.8 364Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.0 94.2 2.2 93.8 2313Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.8 50.0 2462Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.9 50.0 582Below Target
High needs 43.5 50.0 872Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.9 50.0 632Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 39.0 50.0 321Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.4 50.0 2212Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.7 50.0 2473Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.1 50.0 602Below Target
High needs 61.3 50.0 884Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.2 50.0 644Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 57.5 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.8 50.0 2223Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.3 95.6 1.3 96.6 2483Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.8 93.2 1.4 95.9 1322Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.2 92.1 -0.1 97.3 1141No Change
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 88.1 91.3 3.2 94.6 462Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.3 95.8 1.5 96.4 2363Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 95.8 -1.2 98.7 2613Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.7 94.8 0.1 98.7 1342Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.3 96.1 -0.2 100.0 1033Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 89.8 94.9 5.1 94.6 593Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.8 95.5 -1.3 98.6 2473Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.0 1,1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.0 0.7 0.3 1.0 4034Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.1 1.0 0.1 1.0 2983Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 1.0 0.6 0.4 1.0 1634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 754Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 1,0174Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.4 7.7 -1.3 5.3 1,1233Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.1 9.0 -4.9 0.0 670Declined
High needs 8.4 12.9 -4.5 6.0 4040Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 15.7 -6.3 4.8 2490Declined
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 8.2 11.6 -3.4 5.1 1460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 6.5 10.6 -4.1 2.4 1040Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 7.5 -1.0 5.3 9893Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.7 50.1 -9.6 65.4 5390Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 47.5 30.3 -17.2 56.0 1850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.4 30.7 -19.7 60.8 1400Declined
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 29.1 23.6 -5.5 36.4 720Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino 40.6 33.3 -7.3 49.9 420Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 60.8 52.4 -8.4 66.1 4810Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 266 26499Yes 1 265 265100Yes 1 265 264100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 95 9499Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1 95 9499Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 69 6899Yes 1 69 69100Yes 1 69 6899Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 236 23499Yes 1 235 235100Yes 1 235 234100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Bay Path Regional Vocational Technical High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles