Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical (08520000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
57% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement14-04-
Achievement total81247.551267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion14----
Additional indicators total5810.04410.0
Weighted total7.410.7-4.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 69%-44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total71247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total6.910.7-
Percentage of possible points 64%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 98.1 0.4 99.2 1684Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.0 93.3 1.3 94.1 413Met Target
High needs 95.8 96.6 0.8 97.9 882Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.8 99.5 4.7 96.4 474Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 94.9 95.2 0.3 97.4 572Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.5 97.8 0.3 99.1 1504Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 92.0 0.7 93.2 1663Met Target
Lowest Performing 68.3 70.1 1.8 72.5 412Improved Below Target
High needs 83.2 85.2 2.0 85.4 863Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.0 89.7 5.7 86.4 464Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 80.7 79.9 -0.8 84.4 561No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.1 91.2 0.1 93.2 1482Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.9 91.0 -0.9 93.7 1561No Change
Lowest Performing 73.8 70.1 -3.7 77.9 410Declined
High needs 84.1 84.3 0.2 86.7 812Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 80.4 89.3 8.9 82.7 424Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 82.3 79.2 -3.1 85.5 530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.2 90.1 -2.1 94.0 1411No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.5 50.0 1622Below Target
Lowest Performing 32.9 50.0 401Below Target
High needs 42.5 50.0 872Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.1 50.0 473Met Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 39.4 50.0 561Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.6 50.0 1452Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.1 50.0 1603Met Target
Lowest Performing 42.4 50.0 402Below Target
High needs 55.6 50.0 853Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.3 50.0 463Met Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 54.5 50.0 553Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.0 50.0 1433Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.8 99.5 2.7 98.8 1884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.5 99.1 3.6 99.3 1104Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.5 100.0 7.5 96.3 614Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 98.5 -1.5 100.0 674Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.2 100.0 2.8 99.6 1594Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 97.4 -1.4 100.0 1563Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 99.1 96.6 -2.5 100.0 893Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 94.3 -5.7 100.0 530Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 98.5 100.0 1.5 100.0 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 97.2 -1.4 100.0 1443Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.3 -0.2 1.0 7323Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.6 -0.6 1.0 3503Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.4 -1.4 1.0 1430Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.4 -0.4 1.0 2503Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 46--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6493Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.4 4.4 1.0 3.5 7074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 11.1 4.9 6.2 5.6 414Exceeded Target
High needs 6.3 5.4 0.9 3.7 3544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.5 6.5 5.0 7.8 1244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 4.9 4.0 0.9 1.2 2474Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 4.3 0.9 3.2 6314Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.9 64.3 -0.6 71.0 3451No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.6 53.6 -5.0 66.6 1660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.0 53.1 -6.9 70.3 640Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 57.4 50.0 -7.4 62.8 1240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 63.0 65.3 2.3 69.4 3142Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 168 168100Yes 1 168 16699Yes 1 168 16799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 88 88100Yes 1 88 8698Yes 1 88 8799Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 47 47100Yes 1 47 4698Yes 1 47 4698Yes 1
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 57 57100Yes 1 57 5698Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 12----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 150 150100Yes 1 150 14899Yes 1 150 14999Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Nashoba Valley Technical High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles