Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Southwick-Tolland-Granville Regional School District

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Southwick-Tolland-Granville Regional School District

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Southwick-Tolland-Granville Regional School District (07660000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
40% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs assistance (NA)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-34-
Mathematics achievement04-24-04-04-
Science achievement14----24----
Achievement total31260.04867.561247.53867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-24-14-
Mathematics growth24-24-24-14-
Growth total4820.04822.54822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------24----
Extended engagement rate------04----
Annual dropout rate------04----
High school completion total------21220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total0410.02410.04810.04410.0
Weighted total2.99.6-3.87.6-4.610.7-2.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 30%-50%-43%-38%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan40%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
41%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement34-04-
Achievement total51267.521247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---04-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion---04-
Additional indicators total0410.04810.0
Weighted total4.310.3-2.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 42%-26%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan42%
Weight of non-high school results:60%
26%
Weight of high school results:40%
Criterion-referenced target percentage36%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.4 498.3 0.9 499.2 6892Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 477.0 480.5 3.5 481.4 1312Improved Below Target
High needs 489.8 489.9 0.1 491.3 2592Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 181--
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/disabilities---- 130--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.4 498.8 1.4 499.4 6192Improved Below Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 99.1 0.3 100.0 1174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.1 97.3 1.2 98.1 283Met Target
High needs 96.9 97.0 0.1 98.8 332Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.1 0.2 100.0 1144Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.6 495.3 -1.3 498.3 6870Declined
Lowest Performing 474.8 476.8 2.0 477.4 1302Improved Below Target
High needs 489.5 487.0 -2.5 491.0 2580Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 180--
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/disabilities---- 129--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.9 496.0 -0.9 498.6 6170Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 90.4 -4.4 96.6 1170Declined
Lowest Performing 82.0 67.9 -14.1 84.8 280Declined
High needs 88.5 75.0 -13.5 91.0 330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 90.4 -4.5 96.7 1140Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.8 77.5 -0.3 79.6 2391No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 66.1 68.4 2.3 68.4 803Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 60--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/disabilities---- 39--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.7 77.6 -0.1 79.5 2241No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.9 92.0 0.1 93.7 1062Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 88.5 85.7 -2.8 90.8 280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.4 91.7 -0.7 94.2 1031No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.4 50.0 5502Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.8 50.0 1302Below Target
High needs 43.5 50.0 1962Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 135--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/disabilities-- 98--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.9 50.0 5002Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.9 50.0 1082Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.1 50.0 261Below Target
High needs 37.9 50.0 281Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.8 50.0 1062Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.9 50.0 5462Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.8 50.0 1292Below Target
High needs 41.9 50.0 1932Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 133--
EL and Former EL-- 19--
Students w/disabilities-- 96--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.4 50.0 4962Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.1 50.0 1092Below Target
Lowest Performing 31.5 50.0 261Below Target
High needs 42.7 50.0 282Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.5 50.0 1072Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 90.9 91.4 0.5 92.9 1282Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.7 81.8 -1.9 87.8 550Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 46--
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.2 91.7 1.5 92.3 1202Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.4 92.1 -2.3 96.0 1640Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 88.5 87.8 -0.7 92.0 490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.8 91.5 -3.3 96.6 1530Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.1 1.4 -0.3 1.0 4870Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.2 1.5 0.7 2.0 1374Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 81--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/disabilities---- 82--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.2 1.5 -0.3 1.1 4540Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.8 71.4 0.6 71.1 283Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 28--
Students w/disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.0 8.2 -2.2 4.9 9060Declined
Lowest Performing 11.3 9.9 1.4 9.2 1312Improved Below Target
High needs 11.3 14.4 -3.1 9.4 3410Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 221--
EL and Former EL---- 36--
Students w/disabilities---- 154--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 42--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.7 7.4 -1.7 4.7 8140Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.0 12.2 1.8 12.9 4854Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 18.8 7.1 11.7 16.7 284Exceeded Target
High needs 29.9 23.0 6.9 28.0 1354Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 61--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/disabilities---- 71--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.0 12.5 1.5 13.0 4493Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.8 39.4 -5.4 49.4 2460Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 20.3 10.9 -9.4 27.3 640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 41--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 44.8 41.1 -3.7 49.9 2240Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 807 807100Yes 1 807 805100Yes 1 356 356100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 293 293100Yes 1 293 292100Yes 1 113 113100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 200 200100Yes 1 200 199100Yes 1 79 79100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 11----
Students w/disabilities 150 150100Yes 1 150 14999Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 1----
Asian 8---- 8---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 16---- 16---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 16---- 16---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 733 733100Yes 1 733 731100Yes 1 338 338100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Powder Mill SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Southwick Regional SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Woodland SchoolInsufficient data

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles