Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Manchester Essex Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Manchester Essex Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Manchester Essex Regional (06980000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
65% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-34-44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-34-44-34-
Science achievement14----34----
Achievement total51267.56867.5111247.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-24-24-
Mathematics growth24-34-34-24-
Growth total5822.56822.55822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------34----
Additional indicators total3410.00410.06810.00410.0
Weighted total4.810.3-5.47.6-8.810.7-5.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 47%-71%-82%-74%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan59%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
78%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage65%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 511.1 510.6 -0.5 512.9 7023Met Target
Lowest Performing 486.8 491.5 4.7 491.2 1493Met Target
High needs---- 141--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 61--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 80--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 511.0 510.8 -0.2 513.0 6723Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 99.3 -0.7 100.0 1124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 294Exceeded Target
High needs---- 25--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.5 -0.5 100.0 1064Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.3 506.1 -0.2 508.0 7051No Change
Lowest Performing 484.2 486.5 2.3 486.8 1493Met Target
High needs---- 141--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 61--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 80--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.4 506.2 -0.2 508.1 6751No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 97.6 -1.7 100.0 1134Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.3 94.8 -2.5 100.0 293Met Target
High needs---- 25--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 97.9 -1.6 100.0 1074Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.8 83.9 -1.9 87.6 2581No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 48--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 85.9 83.8 -2.1 87.7 2491No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 97.4 -2.1 100.0 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 97.8 -1.7 100.0 1014Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.5 50.0 5843Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.8 50.0 1483Met Target
High needs-- 111--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 46--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 64--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.9 50.0 5623Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.4 50.0 952Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.3 50.0 252Below Target
High needs-- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 7--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.2 50.0 912Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.5 50.0 5872Below Target
Lowest Performing 52.2 50.0 1483Met Target
High needs-- 111--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 46--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 64--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.4 50.0 5652Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.6 50.0 973Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.9 50.0 252Below Target
High needs-- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 7--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.7 50.0 933Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.4 97.3 -0.1 99.4 1123Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 97.2 -0.2 99.5 1093Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 98.3 -0.8 100.0 1153Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 98.3 -0.8 100.0 1153Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.5 -0.5 1.0 4243Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 78--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 41--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.5 -0.5 1.0 4153Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.2 3.8 0.4 3.1 8673Met Target
Lowest Performing 2.6 5.3 -2.7 0.5 1500Declined
High needs---- 167--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 60--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 91--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 3.9 0.3 3.2 8373Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.9 8.4 -1.5 5.8 4513Met Target
Lowest Performing 10.7 13.8 -3.1 8.6 290Declined
High needs---- 92--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.6 8.4 -1.8 5.6 4393Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.7 81.8 5.1 81.3 1983Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 31--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.0 82.1 5.1 82.1 1953Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 825 81499Yes 1 825 81899Yes 1 374 37299Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 170 16698Yes 1 170 16698Yes 1 75 7499Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 71 71100Yes 1 71 71100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 13---- 13---- 7----
Students w/ disabilities 99 9596Yes 1 99 9596Yes 1 47 4698Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 10---- 10---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 789 77899Yes 1 789 78299Yes 1 359 35799Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Essex ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention
Manchester Essex Regional High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Manchester Essex Regional Middle SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Manchester Memorial ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles