Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Berlin-Boylston

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Berlin-Boylston

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Berlin-Boylston (06200000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
66% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-44-34-
Science achievement34----44-44-
Achievement total51267.52867.5121247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-44----
Mathematics growth34-24-44-44-
Growth total5822.54822.58822.54422.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-44-14-
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total0410.04410.04810.01410.0
Weighted total4.510.3-2.77.6-10.110.7-8.49.4-
Percentage of possible points 44%-36%-94%-89%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan40%
Weight of non-high school results:50%
92%
Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.4 502.2 0.8 503.1 2752Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 480.0 481.2 1.2 483.9 392Improved Below Target
High needs---- 92--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 40--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 55--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.4 503.0 1.6 503.0 2453Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 724Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 684Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.6 502.3 -1.3 504.8 2760Declined
Lowest Performing 484.0 482.6 -1.4 486.8 390Declined
High needs---- 93--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 41--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.6 503.1 -0.5 504.9 2461No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.0 98.3 0.3 99.5 744Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.6 96.7 2.1 96.6 233Met Target
High needs---- 25--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.2 98.6 0.4 99.8 694Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.2 84.8 -3.4 90.4 893Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.1 86.7 -2.4 91.2 813Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 99.3 -0.4 100.0 704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.9 98.9 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 99.2 -0.4 100.0 654Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.0 50.0 2632Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.2 50.0 392Below Target
High needs-- 85--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 39--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.5 50.0 2362Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.8 50.0 634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.1 50.0 604Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.0 50.0 2623Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.6 50.0 392Below Target
High needs-- 85--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 39--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.2 50.0 2353Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.5 50.0 644Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 65.3 50.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs-- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 6--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.1 50.0 604Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 91.7 95.5 3.8 92.9 884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.0 96.3 5.3 92.4 814Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 97.2 -2.8 100.0 723Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 97.0 -3.0 100.0 673Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.0 0.3 1.7 1.8 3164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 67--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.8 0.3 1.5 1.6 2934Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 5.3 -3.1 1.2 2820Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 2.6 -2.6 0.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs---- 95--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 58--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.4 5.2 -2.8 1.3 2510Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.6 8.3 2.3 9.6 3264Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 13.0 13.0 0.0 7.7 231No Change
High needs---- 81--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.3 8.6 2.7 10.0 2904Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.1 65.2 -2.9 71.3 1610Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 67.5 64.4 -3.1 70.5 1460Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 351 34799Yes 1 352 35099Yes 1 165 16198Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 118 11597Yes 1 119 11899Yes 1 54 5296Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 48 4696Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1 15----
EL and Former EL 16---- 16---- 8----
Students w/ disabilities 76 7396Yes 1 77 7699Yes 1 38 3797Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 15---- 15---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 315 31399Yes 1 316 315100Yes 1 151 14898Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Tahanto Regional HighNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles