Massachusetts School and District Profiles

River Valley Charter (District)

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - River Valley Charter (District)

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
River Valley Charter (District) (04820000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
74% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total71267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total6.310.3-6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 61%-86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage74%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage86%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.5 507.0 1.5 507.2 1893Met Target
Lowest Performing 482.6 489.5 6.9 486.5 354Exceeded Target
High needs 489.1 492.3 3.2 490.7 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 486.9 487.3 0.4 488.2 362Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.8 507.5 1.7 507.4 1653Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.0 499.8 0.8 500.2 1903Met Target
Lowest Performing 468.9 472.6 3.7 471.7 354Exceeded Target
High needs 481.6 486.3 4.7 483.0 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 482.0 481.9 -0.1 483.8 361No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.6 499.8 1.2 499.9 1653Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.6 83.3 -1.3 86.8 601No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 11--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 4--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.3 82.1 -5.2 89.4 530Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.6 50.0 1523Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.5 50.0 353Met Target
High needs 52.1 50.0 353Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 51.4 50.0 263Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.0 50.0 1324Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.5 50.0 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 49.5 50.0 352Below Target
High needs 49.3 50.0 352Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 12--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 50.4 50.0 253Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.6 50.0 1314Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.9 5.9 -2.0 2.9 2560Declined
Lowest Performing 2.8 5.7 -2.9 0.0 350Declined
High needs 9.3 13.1 -3.8 7.3 610Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 12.8 11.4 1.4 10.1 442Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.3 5.8 -1.5 3.2 2260Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 192 18998Yes 1 192 19099Yes 1 63 6095Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 49 4796Yes 1 49 4898Yes 1 12----
Econ. Disadvantaged 14---- 14---- 5----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 37 3697Yes 1 37 3697Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 7---- 7---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 167 16599Yes 1 167 16599Yes 1 56 5395Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
River Valley Charter SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles