Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Francis W. Parker Charter Essential (District)

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Francis W. Parker Charter Essential (District)

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Francis W. Parker Charter Essential (District) (04780000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
61% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-04-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-44-44-
Science achievement04----34-24-
Achievement total21267.52867.5111247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-44-24-
Mathematics growth14-24-44-34-
Growth total3822.54822.58822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-44-24-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total0410.00410.08810.02410.0
Weighted total2.010.3-2.37.6-10.010.7-8.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 19%-30%-93%-79%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan25%
Weight of non-high school results:40%
86%
Weight of high school results:60%
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.4 505.2 0.8 505.9 1432Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 491.0 490.0 -1.0 495.7 200Declined
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.8 505.2 0.4 506.4 1272Improved Below Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 584Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 534Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.7 502.5 -1.2 505.1 1430Declined
Lowest Performing 484.1 485.2 1.1 487.7 202Improved Below Target
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.9 502.3 -1.6 505.4 1270Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 99.1 1.6 99.2 584Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.9 97.7 4.8 95.7 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.3 99.5 2.2 98.9 534Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.8 71.9 -3.9 78.2 720Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 3--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 76.2 71.8 -4.4 78.6 620Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 96.6 0.4 97.9 583Met Target
Lowest Performing 89.3 92.0 2.7 93.6 222Improved Below Target
High needs---- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.9 96.7 0.8 97.7 533Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.8 50.0 1242Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.4 50.0 202Below Target
High needs-- 26--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.2 50.0 1092Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.6 50.0 564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 48.3 50.0 202Below Target
High needs-- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 2--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.7 50.0 524Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 35.6 50.0 1241Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.7 50.0 202Below Target
High needs-- 26--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 34.7 50.0 1091Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.2 50.0 554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 58.3 50.0 203Met Target
High needs-- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 2--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.7 50.0 514Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 85.2 88.7 3.5 87.5 624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.8 88.1 0.3 89.9 592Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.1 -0.1 99.9 543Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 98.0 0.0 99.8 493Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.0 2624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 50--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 41--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.0 2394Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.1 10.1 -5.0 4.0 1480Declined
Lowest Performing 4.8 20.0 -15.2 1.2 200Declined
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.7 11.5 -6.8 3.4 1310Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.4 10.2 3.2 12.3 2554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 13.6 9.1 4.5 7.0 222Improved Below Target
High needs---- 52--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 13.4 10.3 3.1 12.2 2334Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.8 85.2 7.4 83.5 1284Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 28--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 78.0 83.8 5.8 83.3 1173Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 202 201100Yes 1 202 201100Yes 1 130 130100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 12---- 12---- 5----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 0----
Students w/disabilities 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 19----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 180 180100Yes 1 180 180100Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Francis W. Parker Charter Essential SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles