Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Codman Academy Charter Public (District)

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Codman Academy Charter Public (District)

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Codman Academy Charter Public (District) (04380000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
56% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----24----
Mathematics achievement14----34----
Science achievement44----04----
Achievement total91267.5---51247.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----04----
Mathematics growth24----14----
Growth total4822.5---1822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------04----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------81220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----44----
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total0410.0---4810.0---
Weighted total7.010.3----4.610.7----
Percentage of possible points 68%---43%---
Percentage of possible points by gradespan68%
Weight of non-high school results:50%
43%
Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage56%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement24-34-
Science achievement24-04-
Achievement total81267.541247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-04-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion---04-
Additional indicators total0410.04810.0
Weighted total6.510.3-4.410.7-
Percentage of possible points 63%-41%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan63%
Weight of non-high school results:50%
41%
Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 479.9 482.5 2.6 481.9 1124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 478.2 481.0 2.8 480.2 804Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 68--
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 478.8 481.9 3.1 480.4 974Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.0 95.1 0.1 96.7 362Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.0 93.0 0.0 95.2 251No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 96.4 95.2 -1.2 99.0 261No Change
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 474.8 474.7 -0.1 476.6 1121No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 472.1 472.4 0.3 474.0 802Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 68--
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 474.1 474.5 0.4 475.9 972Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.7 89.0 2.3 88.9 343Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 83.6 85.9 2.3 86.0 233Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 87.9 94.0 6.1 92.8 253Met Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.1 43.9 5.8 41.0 374Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 38.3 39.6 1.3 41.4 242Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 36.8 43.0 6.2 40.1 324Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.1 68.6 -9.5 80.6 350Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 71.3 64.6 -6.7 73.6 240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 78.1 74.0 -4.1 81.3 250Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.4 50.0 842Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 51.0 50.0 603Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 51--
EL and Former EL-- 16--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 48.4 50.0 712Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 24.0 50.0 310Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 23.1 50.0 200Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 23.3 50.0 240Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.0 50.0 852Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 44.7 50.0 602Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 51--
EL and Former EL-- 16--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 46.5 50.0 722Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.9 50.0 311Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 44.9 50.0 202Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 34.3 50.0 241Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 62.5 81.8 19.3 66.3 334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.2 86.7 21.5 69.3 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 30--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 60.0 89.3 29.3 66.3 284Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 87.5 83.3 -4.2 90.6 240Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.1 82.6 -4.5 91.8 230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 87.0 80.0 -7.0 91.8 200Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.7 0.6 2.1 2.4 1554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 3.1 0.0 3.1 2.8 1034Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 75--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 0.0 0.8 -0.8 1.0 1213Met Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White---- 1--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.3 13.9 -0.6 11.4 1650Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 14.5 18.8 -4.3 12.2 1170Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 89--
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 12.5 12.2 0.3 8.6 1392Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.8 24.8 12.0 34.4 1574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 36.1 27.9 8.2 32.9 1114Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 74--
EL and Former EL---- 30--
Students w/ disabilities---- 42--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 38.0 26.5 11.5 33.6 1134Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 39--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White---- 1--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.7 45.1 -14.6 65.8 710Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.4 31.1 -25.3 62.7 450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 61.5 42.6 -18.9 70.7 540Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White-------

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 149 14799Yes 1 148 14699Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 105 10499Yes 1 104 10399Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 86 86100Yes 1 86 8599Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 30 2997Yes 1 29 2897Yes 1 15----
Students w/ disabilities 23 2296Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 124 12298Yes 1 124 12298Yes 1 58 58100Yes 1
Hispanic/Latino 23 23100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 14----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White---------------

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Codman Academy Charter Public SchoolRequiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles