Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Bridgewater

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - West Bridgewater

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
West Bridgewater (03230000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
51% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-14-34-44-
Science achievement04----34----
Achievement total31267.53867.5101247.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-24-14-
Mathematics growth24-24-34-14-
Growth total4822.55822.55822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-34-44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total1410.03410.08810.04410.0
Weighted total3.010.3-3.57.6-8.510.7-6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 29%-46%-79%-83%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan38%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
81%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.2 502.1 0.9 503.0 5882Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 481.3 484.1 2.8 485.7 1112Improved Below Target
High needs---- 181--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 124--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 67--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 30--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 501.8 502.6 0.8 503.8 5122Improved Below Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.8 99.8 0.0 100.0 1064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 264Exceeded Target
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 99.7 0.0 100.0 934Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.4 499.3 -0.1 501.1 5901No Change
Lowest Performing 480.9 480.8 -0.1 483.5 1121No Change
High needs---- 181--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 124--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 67--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 30--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 499.8 499.6 -0.2 501.5 5141No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.4 94.8 1.4 95.2 1053Met Target
Lowest Performing 75.0 80.8 5.8 77.8 264Exceeded Target
High needs---- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.5 96.2 2.7 95.3 923Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.4 72.1 -6.3 80.2 2120Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 70--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.1 72.2 -7.9 81.9 1900Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.3 96.8 1.5 97.1 1013Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 98.0 2.5 97.3 884Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.7 50.0 4972Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.4 50.0 1103Met Target
High needs-- 145--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 103--
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 23--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 48.5 50.0 4342Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.9 50.0 1042Below Target
Lowest Performing 37.1 50.0 261Below Target
High needs-- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 40.5 50.0 922Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.2 50.0 4992Below Target
Lowest Performing 42.5 50.0 1112Below Target
High needs-- 145--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 103--
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 23--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 43.3 50.0 4362Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.8 50.0 1033Met Target
Lowest Performing 36.5 50.0 261Below Target
High needs-- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.1 50.0 913Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 96.9 -0.4 99.3 983Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 24--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 0--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.2 96.8 -0.4 99.3 943Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 98.2 -0.8 100.0 1123Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 37--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 98.1 -0.8 100.0 1063Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.5 -0.5 1.0 4013Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 75--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 52--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.0 0.3 -0.3 1.0 3653Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.9 5.2 -0.3 3.8 7721No Change
Lowest Performing 8.7 7.1 1.6 6.6 1123Met Target
High needs---- 223--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 130--
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/ disabilities---- 84--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 41--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 4.1 5.1 -1.0 3.1 6680Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.4 8.5 2.9 10.3 4134Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 20.0 3.8 16.2 17.9 264Exceeded Target
High needs---- 92--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 56--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 11.3 8.5 2.8 10.3 3634Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.7 98.0 21.3 81.3 1994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 42--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 77.7 97.2 19.5 82.8 1804Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 699 696100Yes 1 699 697100Yes 1 319 319100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 204 204100Yes 1 204 203100Yes 1 92 92100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 141 141100Yes 1 141 14099Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 8----
Students w/ disabilities 73 73100Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Asian 5---- 5---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1 16----
Hispanic/Latino 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 608 605100Yes 1 608 606100Yes 1 283 283100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Howard SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Rose L MacdonaldNot requiring assistance or intervention
Spring Street SchoolInsufficient data
West Bridgewater Junior/SeniorNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles