Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Granby

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Granby

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Granby (01110000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
52% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34----44----
Mathematics achievement14----04----
Science achievement34----14----
Achievement total71267.5---51247.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----44----
Mathematics growth24----24----
Growth total4822.5---6822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------04----
Annual dropout rate------04----
High school completion total------41220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----04----
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total0410.0---4810.0---
Weighted total5.610.3----4.910.7----
Percentage of possible points 54%---46%---
Percentage of possible points by gradespan54%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
46%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.2 498.0 1.8 498.0 3193Met Target
Lowest Performing---- 65--
High needs---- 109--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 78--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 44--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.7 499.1 2.4 498.7 2833Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 99.1 -0.4 100.0 574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 22--
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.4 99.0 -0.4 100.0 514Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.1 496.0 -0.1 497.8 3221No Change
Lowest Performing---- 65--
High needs---- 112--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 81--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 45--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.4 497.4 0.0 499.1 2851No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.0 89.0 -3.0 93.8 570Declined
Lowest Performing---- 22--
High needs---- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.4 92.6 0.2 94.2 512Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.3 71.3 2.0 71.1 1203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 45--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 70.7 72.6 1.9 72.5 1063Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.8 90.7 -1.1 93.6 511No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.3 91.8 0.5 93.1 462Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.8 50.0 2682Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 65--
High needs-- 88--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 61--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.9 50.0 2392Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.5 50.0 494Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.6 50.0 454Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.1 50.0 2682Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 65--
High needs-- 88--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 61--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.9 50.0 2392Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.9 50.0 492Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.4 50.0 453Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.0 95.1 3.1 94.0 824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.9 95.8 3.9 94.0 714Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 94.7 -1.5 97.8 750Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 36--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.0 94.6 -1.4 97.8 740Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 1.2 -0.5 1.0 2440Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 69--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 44--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.8 1.4 -0.6 1.0 2160Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.5 5.9 -1.4 3.4 4270Declined
Lowest Performing---- 66--
High needs---- 161--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 108--
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.8 3.5 0.3 2.8 3683Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.1 11.1 -2.0 8.0 2250Declined
Lowest Performing---- 22--
High needs---- 77--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 49--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.9 10.4 -1.5 7.9 1920Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.4 73.6 18.2 60.0 1064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 32--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 52.5 74.2 21.7 57.6 934Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 379 37699Yes 1 381 37999Yes 1 178 17799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 129 12698Yes 1 131 12998Yes 1 63 6298Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 92 8997Yes 1 94 9298Yes 1 45 4498Yes 1
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 11----
Students w/ disabilities 56 5496Yes 1 56 5598Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 30 30100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 16----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 337 33499Yes 1 338 33699Yes 1 158 15799Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
East MeadowNot requiring assistance or intervention
Granby Jr Sr High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
West StreetNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles