Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Georgetown

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Georgetown

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Georgetown (01050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
48% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs assistance (NA)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-34-44-
Science achievement04----34----
Achievement total11267.54867.5101247.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-44-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-44-34-
Growth total4822.54822.58822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-04-34-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total2410.00410.04810.03410.0
Weighted total1.810.3-3.67.6-8.810.7-6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 17%-47%-82%-89%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan32%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
86%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage48%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.0 504.7 -0.3 506.8 6281No Change
Lowest Performing 483.0 484.1 1.1 487.4 1272Improved Below Target
High needs---- 155--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 73--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 97--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 505.1 504.6 -0.5 507.1 5971No Change

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 99.3 0.3 100.0 1064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.2 99.0 2.8 98.2 244Exceeded Target
High needs---- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.2 0.3 100.0 974Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.0 499.5 -2.5 503.7 6290Declined
Lowest Performing 478.3 479.2 0.9 480.9 1282Improved Below Target
High needs---- 155--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 73--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 97--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 501.9 499.5 -2.4 503.6 5980Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 96.5 1.6 96.7 1063Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.7 88.5 6.8 84.5 244Exceeded Target
High needs---- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.2 96.1 -0.1 98.0 971No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.5 76.3 -5.2 83.3 2120Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 57--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 36--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 81.9 76.4 -5.5 83.7 2010Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 95.8 0.6 97.0 1013Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.7 95.7 0.0 97.5 921No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.3 50.0 5232Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.9 50.0 1272Below Target
High needs-- 124--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 60--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 76--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 48.7 50.0 5002Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.6 50.0 954Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 45.9 50.0 242Below Target
High needs-- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 64.5 50.0 884Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.2 50.0 5242Below Target
Lowest Performing 43.6 50.0 1282Below Target
High needs-- 124--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 60--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 76--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 43.0 50.0 5012Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.7 50.0 944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.4 50.0 243Met Target
High needs-- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.0 50.0 874Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.1 95.7 -0.4 98.1 933Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 95.6 -1.4 99.1 903Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.9 98.1 0.2 99.5 1033Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 29--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 99.0 1.2 99.6 993Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.7 -0.7 1.0 4113Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 84--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.8 -0.8 1.0 3833Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.8 5.5 0.3 4.7 8352Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 6.1 7.8 -1.7 4.0 1280Declined
High needs---- 194--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 83--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 120--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 5.8 5.3 0.5 4.8 7913Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.4 15.9 -1.5 13.3 4160Declined
Lowest Performing 23.1 20.8 2.3 21.0 243Met Target
High needs---- 87--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.1 16.0 -1.9 13.1 3880Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.8 54.8 6.0 53.4 2084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 50--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 50.0 54.9 4.9 55.1 1933Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 739 73499Yes 1 739 73599Yes 1 321 31999Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 173 17199Yes 1 173 17199Yes 1 75 7397Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 80 7999Yes 1 80 7999Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 113 11198Yes 1 113 11198Yes 1 52 5096Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 1----
White 699 69499Yes 1 699 69599Yes 1 301 29999Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Georgetown High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Georgetown Middle SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention
Penn BrookNot requiring assistance or intervention
Perley ElementaryInsufficient data

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles