Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Erving

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Erving

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Erving (00910000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
68% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total61267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24----
Growth total5822.52422.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-24-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.02410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-5.46.7-
Percentage of possible points 54%-81%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage68%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth---
Growth total3422.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.56.7-
Percentage of possible points 97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage97%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.6 497.7 3.1 496.1 694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 474.7 480.0 5.3 480.2 213Met Target
High needs 484.0 489.5 5.5 485.8 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.3 497.3 3.0 496.0 554Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.9 490.2 0.3 491.4 692Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 473.3 477.4 4.1 476.3 214Exceeded Target
High needs 481.2 485.3 4.1 482.8 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 490.3 489.7 -0.6 492.0 550Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.5 73.9 -10.6 87.2 220Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 11--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 18--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.1 50.0 533Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.0 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 50.1 50.0 203Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.8 50.0 442Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.3 50.0 512Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.9 50.0 432Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.5 3.8 6.7 9.2 1054Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 5.0 4.8 0.2 1.1 212Improved Below Target
High needs 21.3 7.7 13.6 19.0 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 12.1 3.5 8.6 10.4 864Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 71 7099Yes 1 71 7099Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 34 3397Yes 1 34 3397Yes 1 12----
Econ. Disadvantaged 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 9----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 16---- 16---- 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 2---- 2---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 57 5698Yes 1 57 5698Yes 1 19----

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Erving ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles