Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pembroke

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Pembroke

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pembroke (02310000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Partially meeting targets

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-44-14-
Mathematics achievement34-44-34-44-
Science achievement14----14----
Achievement total71267.56867.581247.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-24-14-
Growth total5822.55822.55822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------04----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------34----
High school completion total------61220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-04-44-
Advanced coursework completion------44----
Additional indicators total0410.00410.04810.04410.0
Weighted total5.910.3-5.27.6-6.510.7-4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 57%-68%-61%-59%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan63%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
60%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage62%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-04-
Mathematics achievement34-04-
Science achievement24-14-
Achievement total81267.511247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---04-
Extended engagement rate---34-
Annual dropout rate---04-
High school completion total---31220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-
Advanced coursework completion---24-
Additional indicators total0410.04810.0
Weighted total6.510.3-2.410.7-
Percentage of possible points 63%-22%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan63%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
22%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.5 502.3 1.8 502.3 1,3393Met Target
Lowest Performing 480.4 481.9 1.5 484.8 2782Improved Below Target
High needs 489.5 490.8 1.3 491.0 3563Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 207--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 198--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 500.5 502.5 2.0 502.5 1,2913Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.2 98.3 -0.9 100.0 1944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.9 94.4 -2.5 98.9 491No Change
High needs 97.7 88.0 -9.7 99.6 270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.2 98.3 -0.9 100.0 1864Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.5 504.1 1.6 504.2 1,3463Met Target
Lowest Performing 480.0 485.3 5.3 482.6 2784Exceeded Target
High needs 490.1 491.9 1.8 491.6 3623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 213--
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities---- 198--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 502.4 504.2 1.8 504.1 1,2983Met Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.4 94.7 1.3 95.2 1933Met Target
Lowest Performing 72.3 81.1 8.8 75.1 494Exceeded Target
High needs 80.5 76.0 -4.5 83.0 260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 93.9 94.5 0.6 95.7 1853Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.6 76.3 -1.3 79.4 4821No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 62.3 62.5 0.2 64.6 1322Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 84--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 69--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.7 75.9 -1.8 79.5 4641No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.8 95.5 -0.3 97.6 1901No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.5 85.2 -1.3 88.8 271No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 95.6 95.3 -0.3 97.4 1821No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.8 50.0 1,1032Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.9 50.0 2762Below Target
High needs 42.3 50.0 2782Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 160--
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 154--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 46.9 50.0 1,0682Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.5 50.0 1793Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.1 50.0 412Below Target
High needs 46.2 50.0 222Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 50.7 50.0 1713Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.3 50.0 1,1103Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.5 50.0 2773Met Target
High needs 51.7 50.0 2823Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 163--
EL and Former EL-- 15--
Students w/ disabilities-- 155--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 54.5 50.0 1,0753Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.2 50.0 1802Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.0 50.0 421Below Target
High needs 43.4 50.0 212Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 47.1 50.0 1722Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.4 90.5 -4.9 97.4 2430Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.6 76.2 -16.4 96.7 840Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 68--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 39--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 95.3 90.3 -5.0 97.4 2380Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.8 96.2 -0.6 98.4 2383Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.5 95.1 -1.4 100.0 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 61--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 34--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 96.1 -0.6 98.5 2323Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.0 0.9 0.1 1.0 9673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 3.3 -0.8 2.3 1800Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 102--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 94--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 0.8 1.0 -0.2 1.0 9383Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.3 12.6 -6.3 5.2 1,7480Declined
Lowest Performing 9.9 20.1 -10.2 7.8 2780Declined
High needs 11.7 22.5 -10.8 9.8 4850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 241--
EL and Former EL---- 27--
Students w/ disabilities---- 261--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 32--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 6.1 12.4 -6.3 5.1 1,6790Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 37.7 38.8 -1.1 36.6 9280Declined
Lowest Performing 66.7 42.9 23.8 64.6 494Exceeded Target
High needs 59.7 59.0 0.7 57.8 1782Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 77--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 95--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 37.8 39.2 -1.4 36.8 8960Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.5 75.2 5.7 74.1 5044Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 42.4 46.7 4.3 49.4 922Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 69.2 75.7 6.5 74.3 4894Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 1,543 1,53399Yes 1 1,542 1,539100Yes 1 679 676100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 388 38399Yes 1 388 388100Yes 1 160 15999Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 228 22498Yes 1 230 230100Yes 1 102 10199Yes 1
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 5----
Students w/ disabilities 213 212100Yes 1 211 211100Yes 1 83 83100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 18---- 18---- 10----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 1----
White 1,487 1,47799Yes 1 1,486 1,483100Yes 1 653 650100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Bryantville ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention
Hobomock ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention
North Pembroke ElementaryNot requiring assistance or intervention
Pembroke Community Middle SchoolRequiring assistance or intervention
Pembroke High SchoolNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles