Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Adams

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Adams


District Information
District:North Adams (02090000)
Region:Berkshires +
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 82.3, Target = 89.4CPI = 82.3, Target = 89.4 81.9 78.9 82.3 3.4 89.4 91.0 1473950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 85.7 75.4 73.6 77.8 4.2 85.7 87.7 4549050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.3, Target = 77.4CPI = 79.3, Target = 77.4CPI = 79.3, Target = 77.4 75.3 75.3 79.3 4.0 77.4 87.7 31433100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.7, Target = 77CPI = 67.7, Target = 77CPI = 67.7, Target = 77 60.6 62.6 67.7 5.1 77.0 80.3 4521250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 80.9, Target = 81.1CPI = 80.9, Target = 81.1 67.6 77.6 80.9 3.3 81.1 83.8 453475On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 83, Target = 87.5CPI = 83, Target = 87.5CPI = 83, Target = 87.5 78.6 74.4 83.0 8.6 87.5 89.3 224450Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.1 83.0 79.2 82.4 3.2 90.1 91.5 862850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 73.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 73.3, Target = 82.4 69.8 71.6 73.3 1.7 82.4 84.9 1073050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 68.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 68.5, Target = 78.8 63.6 66.4 68.5 2.1 78.8 81.8 4148350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.5, Target = 70.9CPI = 69.5, Target = 70.9CPI = 69.5, Target = 70.9 68.3 68.3 69.5 1.2 70.9 84.2 2642650Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.3, Target = 72.1CPI = 58.3, Target = 72.1CPI = 58.3, Target = 72.1 52.1 54.4 58.3 3.9 72.1 76.1 5220850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 74.3, Target = 74.1CPI = 74.3, Target = 74.1 55.6 64.4 74.3 9.9 74.1 77.8 573475On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 67, Target = 82.9CPI = 67, Target = 82.9CPI = 67, Target = 82.9 70.7 64.4 67.0 2.6 82.9 85.4 54450Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 73.7, Target = 83CPI = 73.7, Target = 83CPI = 73.7, Target = 83 70.9 72.9 73.7 0.8 83.0 85.5 561950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65.7, Target = 81.9CPI = 65.7, Target = 81.9CPI = 65.7, Target = 81.9 68.9 67.8 65.7 -2.1 81.9 84.5 627425No Change
High needsCPI = 60, Target = 77.7CPI = 60, Target = 77.7CPI = 60, Target = 77.7 61.8 58.7 60.0 1.3 77.7 80.9 1017750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.1, Target = 63.5CPI = 62.1, Target = 63.5CPI = 62.1, Target = 63.5 60.2 60.2 62.1 1.9 63.5 80.1 1315750Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50.7, Target = 75CPI = 50.7, Target = 75CPI = 50.7, Target = 75 57.1 55.1 50.7 -4.4 75.0 78.6 12710Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 67.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 67.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 67.2, Target = 82.4 69.9 69.5 67.2 -2.3 82.4 85.0 323425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.1 6.97390 10.9 9.273925
High needs 3.2 5.549025 14.3 12.249025
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 5.543325 11.6 10.94330
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 1.0 1.921225 26.6 23.121225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 2.6 5.93425 10.5 8.83425
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6.7 4.5440 13.3 6.84425
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 8.7 7.26280 11.1 9.762825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.9 16.27300 21.1 17.573025
High needs 9.6 11.848325 26.7 21.748325
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.7 12.742625 23.5 20.742625
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 2.5 5.320825 44.8 31.720825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 10.0 8.8340 27.5 17.63425
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 13.3 4.5440 26.7 22.74425
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 17.6 17.16190 19.9 17.161925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.1 2.62740 20.8 21.22740
High needs 4.9 0.61770 30.1 27.117725
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 0.61570 28.5 22.915725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0710 35.3 40.8710
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 8.8 2.62340 19.4 20.92340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 37.5 42.0 4.5 51.0Yes51875On Target
High needsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 35.5 41.5 6.0 51.0Yes32675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 33.5 41.0 7.5 51.0Yes29375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 39.0 39.5 0.5 51.0No12250Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 31.5 58.0 26.5 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 39.0 41.5 2.5 51.0Yes44675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 39.0 37.0 -2.0 51.0No51625Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 35.0 37.0 2.0 51.0No32550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 35.0 37.0 2.0 51.0No29050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 37.0 40.0 3.0 51.0No12350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 24.0 40.0 16.0 51.0No35100Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 40.0 36.5 -3.5 51.0No44425Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09-
High needs- 60.09-
EL and Former EL- 60.09-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 80 79.6 84.1 4.5 80.0 90.011375On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 80.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 80.8, Target = 80 69.6 80.8 11.2 80.0 90.07375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilitiesCohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80 62.9 73.1 10.2 80.0 90.02650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.07--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.02--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 86.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.3, Target = 80 82.3 86.3 4.0 80.0 90.09575On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 85 77.0 84.1 7.1 85.0 95.011350Improved Below Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 75.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 75.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 75.4, Target = 85 70.3 75.4 5.1 85.0 95.06950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.03--
Students w/ disabilitiesCohort Graduation Rate = 68.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 68.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 68.6, Target = 85 48.6 68.6 20.0 85.0 95.03550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.02--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 85.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.4, Target = 85 78.2 85.4 7.2 85.0 95.09675On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 4.2, Target = 3.6 6.2 3.8 4.2 -0.4 3.6 3.1836125No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 7.3, Target = 4.8 8.2 6.1 7.3 -1.2 4.8 4.161770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  6.6---- 3.3-152--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 6.8, Target = 6.1 10.4 7.2 6.8 0.4 6.1 5.2147325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino  9.4---- 4.7-20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.Dropout Rate = 3.7, Target = 4.2 5.0 4.0 3.7 0.3 4.2 2.5312775On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------4--
WhiteDropout Rate = 4.1, Target = 3.4 5.8 4.0 4.1 -0.1 3.4 2.9829525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students74674099Yes74373198Yes28828599Yes
High needs49649199Yes49248498Yes18818598Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged43643399Yes43242699Yes16416399Yes
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities21521299Yes21320898Yes787596Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black23---23---13---
Hispanic/Latino353497Yes353497Yes13---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.454498Yes454498Yes16---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.3---3---1---
White63262899Yes62961998Yes24324199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles