Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kingston

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Kingston


District Information
District:Kingston (01450000)
Region:Southeast
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 94.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 94.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 94.2 90.0 87.5 83.8 -3.7 94.2 95.0 206140Declined
High needsCPI = 67.5, Target = 86.9CPI = 67.5, Target = 86.9CPI = 67.5, Target = 86.9 77.5 71.8 67.5 -4.3 86.9 88.8 51910Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 74.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 74.1, Target = 80.6 78.8 78.8 74.1 -4.7 80.6 89.4 111120Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.1, Target = 79CPI = 56.1, Target = 79CPI = 56.1, Target = 79 64.0 60.0 56.1 -3.9 79.0 82.0 71150Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.8, Target = 94.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 94.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 94.3 90.3 88.0 84.8 -3.2 94.3 95.2 145730Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.2, Target = 90.8CPI = 86.2, Target = 90.8CPI = 86.2, Target = 90.8 84.3 86.0 86.2 0.2 90.8 92.2 6361450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 69.4, Target = 83.3CPI = 69.4, Target = 83.3 71.4 71.1 69.4 -1.7 83.3 85.7 4918925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.6, Target = 77.1CPI = 76.6, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 76.6 1.6 77.1 87.5 6811275On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 55.1, Target = 75.4CPI = 55.1, Target = 75.4CPI = 55.1, Target = 75.4 57.9 62.9 55.1 -7.8 75.4 79.0 381130Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 90.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 90.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 90.9 84.4 86.5 87.1 0.6 90.9 92.2 6057350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.7, Target = 92.6CPI = 79.7, Target = 92.6CPI = 79.7, Target = 92.6 87.3 88.1 79.7 -8.4 92.6 93.7 371550Declined
High needsCPI = 68.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 68.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 68.6, Target = 87.8 79.0 74.5 68.6 -5.9 87.8 89.5 47510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  83.7---- 91.9-31--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.3, Target = 82.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 82.3CPI = 63.3, Target = 82.3 69.6 65.8 63.3 -2.5 82.3 84.8 603025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.3, Target = 92.6CPI = 80.3, Target = 92.6CPI = 80.3, Target = 92.6 87.3 89.0 80.3 -8.7 92.6 93.7 301470Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.6 9.46140 5.4 9.46140
High needs 4.1 2.61910 16.6 25.71910
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.3 2.71120 12.4 19.61120
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.9 1.711525 26.8 38.31150
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.8 9.65730 5.1 8.45730
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 34.3 34.76140 6.3 8.86140
High needs 13.9 13.21890 18.0 24.31890
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.5 17.91120 15.0 20.51120
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 4.41130 27.7 37.21130
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.8 35.35730 5.7 7.55730
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 28.5 16.11550 3.5 8.41550
High needs 14.9 7.8510 12.8 17.6510
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 10.0 0.0300 20.0 20.0300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.1 15.61470 3.1 8.21470
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 52.0 34.0 -18.0 51.0No44125Below Target
High needsSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 36.5 31.5 -5.0 51.0No12825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 33.0 33.5 0.5 51.0No7450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51 50.0 27.5 -22.5 51.0No780Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 52.0 34.0 -18.0 51.0No41725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 61.0 53.0 -8.0 51.0Yes44275On Target
High needsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 45.0 39.5 -5.5 51.0Yes12675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 42.0 43.0 1.0 51.0Yes7375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 45.0 28.0 -17.0 51.0No760Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 61.0 53.0 -8.0 51.0Yes41775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students62461599Yes62461599Yes15815699Yes
High needs19719297Yes19719096Yes535298Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged112112100Yes112112100Yes3131100Yes
EL and Former EL8---8---2---
Students w/ disabilities12011596Yes12011397Yes323197Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino19---19---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White58357498Yes58357498Yes15014899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles