Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Richmond

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Richmond

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Richmond (02490000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
50% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement14-34-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total41267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total4.110.3-4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 40%-59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total1.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 18%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage18%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.1 507.4 1.3 507.6 1133Met Target
Lowest Performing 490.0 492.5 2.5 494.7 222Improved Below Target
High needs 497.6 495.5 -2.1 499.2 290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.7 498.7 0.0 500.1 221No Change
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.3 508.4 2.1 507.9 1013Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.1 501.0 -0.1 502.5 1131No Change
Lowest Performing 483.9 487.5 3.6 487.5 223Met Target
High needs 490.0 485.8 -4.2 491.7 290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.8 486.9 -2.9 490.9 220Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.3 501.0 -0.3 502.8 1011No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.4 76.3 -9.1 87.8 400Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 85.8 75.7 -10.1 88.2 370Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 50.0 893Met Target
Lowest Performing 48.9 50.0 222Below Target
High needs 50.4 50.0 213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.4 50.0 793Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.8 50.0 893Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.7 50.0 223Met Target
High needs 53.0 50.0 213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 19--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.2 50.0 793Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.3 16.9 -8.6 7.2 1480Declined
Lowest Performing 13.6 18.2 -4.6 10.0 220Declined
High needs 10.8 13.5 -2.7 8.4 370Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.4 20.0 -12.6 3.9 250Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.0 15.0 -7.0 6.7 1330Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 114 11399Yes 1 114 11399Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 12----
Econ. Disadvantaged 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 9----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 8---- 8---- 4----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 7---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 102 10199Yes 1 102 10199Yes 1 38 3797Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Richmond ConsolidatedNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles